Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:29:31.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Performance Ratings: The Long Road to Effective Performance Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Robert L. Cardy  and
Deeksha Munjal
Robert L. Cardy*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Texas at San Antonio
Deeksha Munjal
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Texas at San Antonio
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Robert L. Cardy, Department of Management, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-0634. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Performance evaluation has long been a source of dissatisfaction for practitioners and a focus of research for scholars. The current call for the elimination of performance ratings is not new. This commentary considers the quality perspective as a historical context in which performance ratings were, at best, considered a misguided management tool. Although the current debate doesn't seem to be philosophically based, it may be useful to recognize that serious questions regarding performance ratings have come up before. Potential measurement problems with performance ratings are considered. It is concluded that performance ratings are not the major problem for performance management. Possible sources of problems with performance management are considered. Directions for improvement are discussed.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 322 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 219–252.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Using performance management to win the talent war. Business Horizons, 55, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6, 205–212.Google Scholar
Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (2005). Research streams in rater self-efficacy. Group and Organization Management, 30, 61–88.Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now, discover your strengths. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015, April). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93, 40–50.Google Scholar
Cardy, R. L., Dobbins, G. H., & Carson, K. P. (1995). TQM and HRM: Improving performance appraisal research, theory, and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 12 (1), 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardy, R. L., & Leonard, B. (2011). Performance management: Concepts, skills, and exercises (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharp.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Study.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D. (1979). The transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 533–540.Google Scholar
Garr, S. (2013). Reengineering for agility: How Adobe eliminated performance appraisals. Oakland, CA: Bersin by Deloitte.Google Scholar
Larson, J. R. (1986). Supervisors’ performance feedback to subordinates: The impact of subordinate performance valence and outcome dependence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 391–408.Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616.Google Scholar
Noonan, L. E., & Sulsky, L. M. (2001). Impact of frame-of-reference and behavioral observation training on alternative training effectiveness criteria in a Canadian military sample. Human Performance, 14, 3–26.Google Scholar
Olson, J. (2013, August 30). When doctors get it wrong: Misdiagnoses are getting a closer look. Star Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com/when-doctors-get-it-wrong-misdiagnoses-are-getting-a-closer-look/323328471/Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Mueller-Hanson, R. A., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8, 51–76.Google Scholar
Robinson, F. F., & Hardt, D. A. (1992). Effects of cognitive and behavioral structure and discussion of corrective feedback outcomes on counseling group development. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 473–481.Google Scholar
Schleicher, D. J., & Day, D. V. (1998). A cognitive evaluation of frame-of-reference training: Content and process issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 76–101.Google Scholar