Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:28:31.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An open-systems approach to course redesign: Moving beyond the pulpit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Mateo Cruz  and
Frank D. Golom Open the ORCID record for Frank D. Golom [Opens in a new window]
Mateo Cruz*
Affiliation:
Management Department, Bentley University, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA02452
Frank D. Golom
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Maryland, 4501 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD21210
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 519 - 523
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, J. A. (2008). An introduction to multicultural education (4th ed). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bell, M. P., Connerley, M. L., & Cocchiara, F. K. (2009). The case for mandatory diversity education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 597–609.Google Scholar
Brawley, D., Campbell, S., Desman, R., Kolenko, T., & Moodie, D. (2013). Integrating the core: A new management curriculum to empower our students. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Burke, W. W. (2014). Organization change: Theory and practice (4th ed). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Chauhan, R. S. (2019). Occupation exploration: Using O*NET in the management classroom. Management Teaching Review, 4(1), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, D. (2019). Doing action research in your own organization (5th ed). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Hart Research, Associates (2015). Falling short? College learning and career success. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. M., & Renard, M. K. (2015). Negotiating your syllabus: Building a collaborative contract. Journal of Management Education, 39(3), 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kath, L., Salter, N., Bachiochi, P., Brown, K., & Hebl, M. (2021). Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(4), 443–460.Google Scholar
Kushner, R. J. (1999). Curriculum as strategy: The scope and organization of business education in liberal arts colleges. Journal of Higher Education, 70(4), 413–440.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organizations. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Raelin, J. A., & Coghlan, D. (2006). Developing managers as learners and researchers: Using action learning and action research. Journal of Management Education, 30(5), 670–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (2016). Guidelines for education and training in industrial-organizational psychology. https://www.siop.org/Events-Education/Graduate-Training-Program/Guidelines-for-Education-and-Training Google Scholar
Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 92–97.Google Scholar