No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Adding competency models to the pay equity toolbox
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Footnotes
All authors are employed by SHL, the owner of copyrighted content referenced in this paper. None of the authors own the content that is referenced, nor does any receive any royalties from the sale of these (or other) SHL products. Readers who are interested in using the SHL products referenced in this paper for research purposes are invited to contact the authors to discuss opportunities to engage in a research partnership at no cost.
References
Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1185–1203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2009). What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis? Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.002
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 703–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00220.x
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strah, N., Rupp, D. E., & Morris, S. (2021). Job analysis and job classification for addressing pay inequality in organizations: Adjusting our methods within a shifting legal landscape. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(1), 1–45.Google Scholar