Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:05:52.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What If We Took Within-Person Performance Variability Seriously?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Cynthia D. Fisher
Cynthia D. Fisher*
Affiliation:
Bond University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Business, Bond University, Gold Coast QLD 4229, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 185 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

School of Business, Bond University

References

Barnes, C. M., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Typical performance, maximal performance, and performance variability: Expanding our understanding of how organizations value performance. Human Performance, 20, 259–274.Google Scholar
Borman, W. C., (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 271–326). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. D., & Noble, C. S. (2004). A within-person examination of correlates of performance and emotions while working. Human Performance, 17, 145–168.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kane, J. S. (1986). Performance distribution assessment. In Berk, R. A. (Ed.), Performance assessment: Methods & applications (pp. 237–273). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mangos, P. M., Steele-Johnson, D., LaHuis, D., & White, E. D III. (2007). A multiple-task measurement framework for assessing maximum-typical performance. Human Performance, 20, 241–258.10.1080/08959280701333115Google Scholar
Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2008). Explaining the weak relationship between job performance and ratings of job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 148–160.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00030.xGoogle Scholar
Newman, J., Krzystofiak, F., & Cardy, R. (1986). Role of behavior level, behavioral variability, and ratee order in the formation of appraisal ratings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 277–293.10.1207/s15324834basp0704_3Google Scholar
Rambo, W. W., Chomiak, A. M., & Price, J. M. (1978). Consistency of performance under stable conditions of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 78–87.10.1037/0021-9010.68.1.78Google Scholar
Stewart, G. L., & Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2006). Adaptation and intraindividual variation in sales outcomes: Exploring the interactive effects of personality and environmental opportunity. Personnel Psychology, 59, 307–332.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00016.xGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. L., & Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2007). Exploring how constraints created by other people influence intraindividual variation in objective performance measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1149–1158.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557–574.Google Scholar
Woehr, D. J., & Miller, M. J. (1997). Distributional ratings of performance: More evidence for a new rating format. Journal of Management, 23, 705–720.Google Scholar