Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:34:15.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uses and limitations of ethical dilemmas in understanding and applying ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2021

Rodney L. Lowman Open the ORCID record for Rodney L. Lowman [Opens in a new window]
Rodney L. Lowman*
Affiliation:
Lowman & Richardson/Consulting Psychologists, PC and CSPP/Alliant International University, San Diego
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 320 - 324
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.html Google Scholar
Hobb, N. (1948). The development of a code of ethical standards for psychology. American Psychologist, 3, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, D. H., Carter, D., Lopez, C. V., Benzmiller, H., Guo, A., Latifi, Y., & Craig, D. (2015). Report to the special committee of the board of directors of the American Psychological Association independent review relating to APA ethics guidelines, national security interrogations, and torture. Sidney Austin LLP. https://www.apa.org/independent-review/revised-report.pdf Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2017). Ethics and values in industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2021). Forms of ethical dilemmas in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(3), 297–319.Google Scholar
Lowman, R. L. (Ed.). (2006). The ethical practice of psychology in organizations (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association & Society of Industrial-Organizational Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowman, R. L. (2014). Social justice in industrial-organizational and consulting psychology. In Johnson, C. V. & Friedman, H. L. (Eds.), Praeger handbook of social justice and psychology, Vol. 3, Youth and disciplines (pp. 165–181). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stimpert, J. (2001, January 22). Hopkins history: John Broadus Watson: The father of behavioral psychology. The Gazette on Line. The newspaper of the Johns Hopkins University, 30(18). https://pages.jh.edu/gazette/2001/jan2201/22watson.html Google Scholar