Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T10:23:47.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transactive memory systems in virtual teams: Opportunities post COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2021

Harry L. Kohn
Harry L. Kohn*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Duluth
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Pandemic Issue , June 2021 , pp. 274 - 276
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachrach, D. G., Lewis, K., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Campion, M. C., & Thatcher, S. (2019). Transactive memory systems in context: A meta-analytic examination of contextual factors in transactive memory systems development and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 464–493.10.1037/apl0000329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization science, 15(6), 633–644.10.1287/orsc.1040.0069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. P., & Wilmot, M. P. (2018). The functioning of theory in industrial, work, and organizational psychology (IWOP). In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), The sage handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 3–37). Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Emich, K. J., & Wright, T. A. (2016). The “I”s in team. Organizational Dynamics, 1(45), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., & Melick, S. R. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 273–290.10.1017/iop.2020.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18(1), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 378–394.10.1037/1089-2680.12.4.378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar