Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:25:24.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple solution to a complex problem: Manipulate the mediator!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2021

Scott Highhouse  and
Margaret E. Brooks
Scott Highhouse*
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Margaret E. Brooks
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 493 - 496
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breaugh, J. A., & Colihan, J. P. (1994). Measuring facets of job ambiguity: Construct validity evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highhouse, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). A snapshot in time: Industrial and organizational psychology today. In Schmitt, N. & Highhouse, S. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Volume 12: Industrial and Organizational, pp. 3–13). Wiley.Google Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M., & Melick, S. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2013). Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A(Statistics in Society), 176(1), 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. J., Johnson, K. A., Cohen, A. B., Williams, M. J., Knowles, E. D., & Chen, Z. (2012). Fundamental(ist) attribution error: Protestants are dispositionally focused. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 281–290.10.1037/a0026294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J. P., & Gellatly, I. R. (1988). Perceived performance norm as a mediator in the effect of assigned goal on personal goal and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 410–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2021). In praise of table 1: The importance of making better use of descriptive statistics. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(4), 461–477.Google Scholar
Nolan, K. P., & Highhouse, S. (2014). Need for autonomy and resistance to standardized employee selection practices. Human Performance, 27(4), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirlott, A. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38.10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11–33.10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone-Romero, E. F., & Rosopa, P. J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 326–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science: Kirstie Whitaker and Olivia Guest ask how open “open science” really is. Psychologist, 33, 34–37.Google Scholar