Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:28:09.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Secure, Online, High-Stakes Testing: Science Fiction or Business Reality?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

David Foster
David Foster*
Affiliation:
Kryterion, Inc.
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 31 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper is based on a presentation made at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology annualmeeting inApril 10–12, 2008, in San Francisco, CA (Foster, 2008b).

References

American National Standards Institute. (2007). Retrieved from http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/ConformityAssessment/PersonnelCertifierAccreditation/DocumentsrelatedtoaccreditationunderANSI-ISO-IEC17024/PublicDocuments/ANSI-PCAC-GI-504.pdf Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2003). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Principle 9.01 Bases for Assessments, Section (b). Retrieved from www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html Google Scholar
Caveon Test Security (2008). Cheating in the News. Retrieved from www.caveon.com/citn/ Google Scholar
Chapman, D. S., & Webster, J. (2003). The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening, and selection processes for job candidates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 113–120.10.1111/1468-2389.00234Google Scholar
Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410601520Google Scholar
Foster, D. F. (2008a, March 3–5). Psychometric properties and acceptability of the Foster Item format. Poster presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Association of Test Publishers, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Foster, D. F. (2008b, April 1012). Secure, online, high-stakes testing: Science fiction or business reality? Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Foster, D. F. (2008c, March 35). Testing where you live, learn and work: Science fiction or business reality? Presentation at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Association of Test Publishers, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
International Test Commission (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and Internet-delivered testing: Version 2005. International Journal of Testing, 6, 143–172.10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4Google Scholar
Tippens, N. T., Beaty, J., Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D. O., et al. (2006). Unproctored Internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59, 189–225.Google Scholar