Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:39:58.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizational success: The importance of conceptual clarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2022

Nathaniel M. Voss Open the ORCID record for Nathaniel M. Voss [Opens in a new window] ,
Stacy A. Stoffregen  and
Kelsey L. Couture
Nathaniel M. Voss*
Affiliation:
FMP Consulting
Stacy A. Stoffregen
Affiliation:
Colorado Department of Transportation
Kelsey L. Couture
Affiliation:
The Workplace Futurist, LLC
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 424 - 427
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: Asocial-exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J. Jr. (2011). Does human capital matter? Ameta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, I.-S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1222–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, E. A. (2003). Good definitions: The epistemological foundation of scientific progress. In Greenberg, J. (Ed.), Organizational behavior, state of the science (pp. 415–444). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. (2012). Construct validity vs. concept validity. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 146–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Parhizgari, A. M., & Gilbert, G. R. (2004). Measures of organizational effectiveness: Private and public sector performance. Omega, 32(3), 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ployhart, R. E. (2012). The psychology of competitive advantage: An adjacent possibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5(1), 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., & Hale, D. Jr. (2014). The fascinating psychological microfoundations of strategy and competitive advantage. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2016). Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 159–203.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Kantrowitz, T., & Schneider, B. (2019). What leads to organizational agility: It’s not what you think. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(4), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., & Pulakos, E. P. (2022). Expanding the I-O psychology mindset to organizational success. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(3), 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Darwish, T. K., & Potočnik, K. (2016). Measuring organizational performance: Acase for subjective measures. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, S. R. (1965). Criteria for what? American Psychologist, 20(6), 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar