Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:01:02.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Licensure Issue in I-O Psychology: A Canadian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

Lynda Zugec*
Affiliation:
Canadian Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (CSIOP), The Workforce Consultants
John L. Michela
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lynda Zugec, Managing Director, The Workforce Consultants. E-mail: [email protected].

Extract

The issue of registration/licensure as it is currently being discussed in North America is one that is near and dear to many of us involved with industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology in Canada. The consequences of any potential regulatory changes could be profound, and Canadian regulatory authorities, like any others, may be cued by other jurisdictions, including those within the United States, concerning standards and requirements.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Licensure of Consulting and I-O Psychologists (LCIOP) Joint Task Force. (2017). The licensure issue in consulting and I-O psychology: A discussion paper. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (2), 144181.Google Scholar