Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T13:30:43.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I-O at a Crossroad: The Value of an Intersectional Research Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Kayla Weaver ,
Matthew P. Crayne  and
Kisha S. Jones
Kayla Weaver*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
Matthew P. Crayne
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
Kisha S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kayla Weaver, Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 630 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The focal article written by Bergman and Jean (2016) draws attention to a critical void in the industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology domain: the study of low- and medium-skill workers. Although segmenting employees based on their job status may provide new conceptualizations of employee work experiences, this approach may not provide the nuanced view necessary to fully comprehend the many ways in which employees differentially experience the workplace. Within this category of workers, experiences may vary based on employees’ race, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), or other identity-defining characteristics, and these person-specific identities may interact with one another. An intersectional research approach provides a foundation on which researchers can more fully understand how individuals’ multiple social identities interact to affect their workplace experiences. In the commentary that follows, we provide an overview of intersectional research and describe how such a perspective would lead to meaningful developments within I-O psychology.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 197 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAUW. (2015). The simple truth about the gender pay gap. Retrieved from http://www.aauw.org/files/2015/09/The-Simple-Truth-Fall-2015.pdf Google Scholar
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20 (4), 441–464. doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, F. (1979). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In Cade, T. (Ed.), The black woman: An anthology (pp. 90–100). New York, NY: Signet.Google Scholar
Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (2), 426–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426 Google Scholar
Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., & Zelditch, M. (2002). Construction of status and referential structures. Sociological Theory, 20 (2), 157–179. doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all of the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 84–113.Google Scholar
Black, L. L., & Stone, D. (2005). Expanding the definition of privilege: The concept of social privilege. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64 (3), 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Weisbert, D. K. (Ed.), Feminist legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383–395). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Derous, E., Ryan, A. M., & Serlie, A. W. (2014). Double jeopardy upon resume screening: When Achmed is less employable than Aisha. Personnel Psychology, 68 (3), 659–696. doi:10.1111/peps.12078 Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109 (3), 573–598. doi:0.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573 Google Scholar
Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. (2005). Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66 (3), 438–456. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frable, D. E. (1997). Gender, racial, ethnic, sexual, and class identities. Annual Review of Psychology, 48 (1), 139–162. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.139 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55 (2), 273–297. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1), 64–86. doi:10.2307/256352 Google Scholar
Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Marín, A., Carrillo, L., Burke, B., Coates, M. L., & Quandt, S. A. (2007). Work–family conflict: Experiences and health implications among immigrant Latinos. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (4), 1119–1130. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1119 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5 (1), 63–79. doi:10.1017/S1537592707070065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 (6), 935–942.Google Scholar
Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60 (1), 27–36. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.27 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heymann, J. (2000). The widening gap: Why America's working families are in jeopardy and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hooijberg, R., & DiTomaso, N. (1996). Leadership in and of demographically diverse organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 7 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90032-6 Google Scholar
King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 14 (1), 42–72. doi:10.1086/494491 Google Scholar
Kvasny, L., Trauth, E. M., & Morgan, A. J. (2009). Power relations in IT education and work: The intersectionality of gender, race, and class. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 7 (2/3), 96–118. doi:10.1108/14779960910955828 Google Scholar
Lee, T. W. (1998). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lowery, B. S., Knowles, E. D., & Unzueta, M. M. (2007). Framing inequity safely: Whites’ motivated perceptions of racial privilege. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (9), 1237–1250. doi:10.1177/0146167207303016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maracek, J., Fine, M., & Kidder, L. (1997). Working between worlds: Qualitative methods and social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 53 (4), 631–644.Google Scholar
Maume, D. J. (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations, 26 (4), 483–509. doi:10.1177/0730888499026004005 Google Scholar
Morrison, A. M., & von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45 (2), 200–208. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.200 Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatli, A., & Bell, M. P. (2011). Work–life, diversity and intersectionality: A critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13 (2), 177–198. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00291.x Google Scholar
Parent, M. C., DeBlaere, C., & Moradi, B. (2013). Approaches to research on intersectionality: Perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, 68 (11–12), 639–645. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0283-2 Google Scholar
Presser, H. B. (2003). Race-ethnic and gender differences in nonstandard work shifts. Work and Occupations, 30 (4), 412–439. doi:10.1177/0730888403256055 Google Scholar
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59 (5), 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4 Google Scholar
Rosenfield, S. (2012). Triple jeopardy? Mental health at the intersection of gender, race, and class. Social Science & Medicine, 74 (11), 1791–1801. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (2), 356–360. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10/016 Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbugler, A. C., Press, J. E., & Dias, J. J. (2006). Gender, race, and affirmative action: Operationalizing Intersectionality in survey research. Gender & Society, 20 (6), 805–825. doi:10.1177/0891243206293299 Google Scholar
Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59 (5–6), 454–463. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, S., Carr, J., MacQuarrie, B., & Huntley, A. (2006). “I'm not thinking of it as sexual harassment”: Understanding harassment across race and citizenship. Gender & Society, 20 (1), 87–107. doi:10.1177/0891243205282785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitely, W., Dougherty, T. W., & Dreher, G. F. (1991). Relationship of career mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers’ and professionals’ early career progress. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (2), 331–350. doi:10.2307/256445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar