Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:06:56.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “How” Matters as Much as the “Who”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Ashley J. Hoffman
Ashley J. Hoffman*
Affiliation:
Human Resources Department, National Railroad Passenger Corp.
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ashley J. Hoffman, National Railroad Passenger Corp. - Human Resources, 60 Massachusetts Ave. NE, 2E-211, Washington, DC 20002–4285. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It appears that although Gloss, Carr, Reichman, Abdul-Nasiru, and Oestereich (2017) have considered many of the arenas where industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology intersects with impoverished or atypical populations, an oft-overlooked domain is that of I-O psychologists working in military settings. Arguably the largest humanitarian aid and development organization in the world, national militaries offer a rich opportunity for I-O psychologists to study not only the more “POSH” aspects of work, but also the difficulties surrounding employees who must address impoverished citizens, lack of resources, bureaucracy far removed from the front lines, discrimination, threats to safety, and all kinds of cross-cultural interactions. As such, this humanistic, humanitarian movement could do well from studying the ways military units have successfully and not-so-successfully approached a timely and difficult subject.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 396 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fine, S., Goldenberg, J., & Noam, Y. (2016). Integrity testing and the prediction of counterproductive behaviours in the military. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89 (1), 198–218. doi: 10.1111/joop.12117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloss, A., Carr, S. C., Reichman, W., Abdul-Nasiru, I., & Oesterich, W. T. (2017). From handmaidens to POSH humanitarians: The case for making human capabilities the business of I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (3), 329–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, M., McLarnon, M., & King, G. (2016). The role of self-regulation in workplace resiliency. Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 416–421. doi: 10.1017/iop.2016.32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar