Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T12:39:12.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cutting the cord: Good riddance to ineffective DEI programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2024

Denise Robb  and
Sarah Rana
Denise Robb*
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
Sarah Rana
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Denise Robb; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2024 , pp. 507 - 510
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, R., & Winters, M. F. (2008). A retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(3), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateh, J., Klaus, T., Farah, J., & Coram, S. (2023). DEI and operational excellence: Exploring the business case and practical implications for OM/SCM leaders. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 29(3), 44–59.Google Scholar
Burnett, L., & Aguinis, H. (2024). How to prevent and minimize DEI backfire. Business Horizons, 67(2), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E. H., Milkman, K. L., Gromet, D. M., Rebele, R. W., Massey, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Grant, A. M. (2019). The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 116(16), 7778–7783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. S., & Chang, L. (2016). A meta-analytic multitrait multirater separation of substance and style in social desirability scales. Journal of Personality, 84(3), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, W. T., & Devine, P. G. (2019). The prejudice habit-breaking intervention: An empowerment-based confrontation approach. In Mallett, R. K., & Monteith, M. J. (Eds.), Confronting prejudice and discrimination (pp. 249–274). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G., & Ash, T. L. (2022). Diversity training goals, limitations, and promise: A review of the multidisciplinary literature. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 403–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, N. T. (2024, March 11). What is DEI and why is it dividing America? CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/09/us/what-is-dei-and-why-its-dividing-america/index.html Google Scholar
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2020). Getting serious about diversity. Harvard Business Review, 98(6), 114–122.Google Scholar
Federo, R. (2024). The rainbow glass ceiling: Breaking barriers for LGBTQ+ inclusion in board diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, (ja), amp-2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follmer, K., Sabat, I., Jones, K., & King, E. (2024). Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17.Google Scholar
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2023). Why do companies go woke? Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(4), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup. (2022). Force for good report. https://www.bentley.edu/files/gallup/Bentley-Gallup_Force_for_Good_Report_final.pdf Google Scholar
Keiser, N. L., & Payne, S. C. (2019). Are employee surveys biased? Impression management as a response bias in workplace safety constructs. Safety Science, 118, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, C. T., Pepper, M. B., Roberson, L., & Parker, S. K. (2007). The rich get richer: Predicting participation in voluntary diversity training. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(6), 753–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, L. M. (2019). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 538–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., McKee, D. O., & McMurrian, R. (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, A., & Śliwa, M. (2024). Critiquing the backlash against wokeness: In defense of DEI scholarship and practice. Academy of Management Perspectives, (ja), amp-2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, L. B. D., & De Domenico, S. M. R. (2015). Person-organization fit: bibliometric study and research agenda. European Business Review, 27(6), 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., & Sparr, J. L. (2023). Rethinking diversity strategies: An application of paradox and positive organization behavior theories. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(2), 174–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, K. P., Taylor, N., Hall, A. V., Bell, M. P., Nottingham, A., & Evans, L. (2024). They say they support diversity initiatives, but they don’t demonstrate it”: The impact of DEI paradigms on the emotional labor of HR&DEI professionals. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippia. (2024, April 5). Chief diversity officer demographics and statistics [2024]: Number of chief diversity officers in the US.). https://www.zippia.com/chief-diversity-officer-jobs/demographics/ Google Scholar