Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T08:53:49.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age bias in the time of Coronavirus: Implications for research and practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2021

Lucinda J. Iles  and
Sharon K. Parker
Lucinda J. Iles*
Affiliation:
Centre for Transformative Work Design, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
Sharon K. Parker
Affiliation:
Centre for Transformative Work Design, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Pandemic Issue , June 2021 , pp. 66 - 70
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR; project number CE170100005) and Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

References

Andrei, D., Parker, S. K., Constantin, A., Baird, M., Iles, L., Petery, G., Zoszak, L., Williams, A., & Chen, S. (2019). Maximising potential: Findings from the Mature Workers in Organisations Survey (MWOS) [Industry report]. ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR). https://www.cepar.edu.au/publications/reports-government-submissions/maximising-potential-findings-mature-workers-organisations-survey-mwos Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights Commission. (2020). Ageism and COVID-19. https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/ageism-and-covid-19 Google Scholar
Ayalon, L., Chasteen, A., Diehl, M., Levy, B. R., Neupert, S. D., Rothermund, K., Tesch-Romer, C., & Wahl, H. (2021). Aging in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Avoiding ageism and fostering intergenerational solidarity. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), e49–e52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Older adults. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/older-adults.html Google Scholar
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020). Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(10), 1101–1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000482 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosking, D., Ee, N., Maccora, J., Ee, N., & McCallum, J. (2020). Older Australians’ life and care during the pandemic. National Seniors.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. W., & Butrica, B. A. (2012). Age disparities in unemployment and reemployment during the Great Recession and recovery. Urban Institute Brief 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, M. S. (2019). A gate to understanding “older” workers: Generation, age, tenure, experience. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 414–443. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Pyschology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2020). “The COVID-19 generation”: A cautionary note. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(3), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). An integrative theory of intergroup relations. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 969–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311426187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oaks, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassilopoulou, J., Kyriakidou, O., da Rocha, J. P., Georgiadou, A., & Mor Barak, M. (2019). International perspectives on securing human and social rights and diversity gains at work in the aftermath of the global economic crisis and in times of austerity. European Management Review, 16(4), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar