Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:39:47.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wena Hotels Ltd v. Arab Republic of Egypt

ICSID (Arbitration Tribunal).  29 June 1999 ; 08 December 2000 ; 05 February 2002 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Objections to jurisdiction — Bilateral investment treaty — Exceptions to the nationality requirement — icsid Convention, Article 25(2)(b) — Whether company incorporated in one State Party and owned by nationals of another State Party is a “national” of the former — Existence of prima facie “legal dispute” for the purpose of determining jurisdiction

Arbitration — Bilateral investment treaty — Alleged violations of bit by Respondent through its State enterprise

Foreign investment — Failure to provide “fair and equitable treatment” and “full protection and security” to an investment — UK–Egypt Bilateral Investment Treaty, Article 2(2) — Failure to prevent seizure of an investment — Failure to impose substantial sanctions for seizure

Expropriation — Failure to provide prompt, adequate and effective compensation — UK–Egypt Bilateral Investment Treaty, Article 5

Municipal law — Time bar — Whether claims time-barred by domestic statute of limitation — Domestic statutes of limitation not binding on international tribunal

Damages — Determination of damages — Prompt, adequate and effective compensation — Compensation amounting to the market value of an investment — UK–Egypt Bilateral Investment Treaty, Article 5

Annulment — Time limit for request for annulment — icsid Convention, Article 52 — Raising new arguments related to a ground of annulment invoked within the time limit fixed in the icsid Convention

Annulment — Grounds for — Manifest failure to apply applicable law — icsid Convention, Article 42(1) — Subject matter of commercial agreements as opposed to subject matter brought before icsid arbitration — Role of international law in the context of Article 42(1) — Relationship between international law and domestic law

Annulment — Grounds for — Manifest excess of power by arbitral tribunal — Sufficiency of evidence — Relationship between domestic arbitration and arbitration under the icsid Convention — Compensation under domestic arbitration to be taken into account when awarding damages under the icsid Convention — Criteria for compensation under UK–Egypt Bilateral Investment Treaty, Article 5

Compensation — Interest — How calculated — Compound interest — Exercise of discretion

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)