Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:46:06.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women's Agency in a Context of Oppression: Assessing Strategies for Personal Action and Public Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Carol Chetkovich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Popular debates about “victim feminism” have receded but underlying concerns about the extent of gender inequality and usefulness of strategies highlighting difference are still relevant. This paper applies Susan Wendell's framework—relating to women's agency under conditions of oppression—to the experience of women firefighters. The framework fits well, but one case reveals the need to modify it by attending to community. An elaboration of the framework is then used to examine four policy issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Fall 2004 , pp. 122 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Charlotte. 2002. Return of the guy. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, March 17.Google Scholar
American Association of University Women (AAUW). 1992. How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, D.C.: AAUW Educational Foundation and National Education Association.Google Scholar
Antioch College Sexual Offense Prevention Policy. June 8 1996. http://www.antioch‐college.edu/survival/html/sopp.html (accessed June 27, 2002).Google Scholar
Baier, John, Rosenzweig, Marianne, and Whipple, Edward. 1991. Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization of university students. Journal of College Student Development 32(July): 310–22.Google Scholar
Banaji, Mahzarin, and Hardin, Curtis. 1996. Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science. 7(3): 136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaji, Mahzarin, Hardin, Curtis, and Rothman, Alexander. 1993. Implicit stereotyping in person judgment, journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65(2): 272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Derrick. 1976. Serving two masters: Integration ideals and client interests in school desegregation litigation. Yale Law journal 85: 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Shereen, and Scherer, Lisa. 2001. The unexpected effects of a sexual harassment educational program. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 37(2): 125–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Francine, and Kahn, Lawrence. 1996. Wage structure and gender earnings differentials: An international comparison. Economica 63(250, Supplement): S29–S62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Francine, Ferber, Marianne, and Winkler, Anne. 1998. The economics of women, men, and work, 3rd. ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Browne, Kingsley. 1991. Title VII as censorship: Hostile‐environment harassment and the first amendment. Ohio State Law journal 52: 481–550.Google Scholar
Buhler, Patricia. 1999. The manager's role in preventing sexual harassment. Supervision 60(4): 16–18.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The civil rights society: The social construction of victims. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1987. Victims in the shadow of the law: A critique of the model of equal protection. Signs 12(3): 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Sarah E. 1995. Issues in workplace sexual harassment law and related social science research, journal of Social Issues 51(1): 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1991. Reflections of an affirmative action baby. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Center for Social Policy and Practice in the Workplace. 1988. Gender integration in the New York fire department: A review and recommendations. New York: Columbia University School of Social Work.Google Scholar
Chanda, Rajib. 2001. Mediating university sexual assault cases. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6: 265–318.Google Scholar
Chetkovich, Carol. 1997. Real heat: Gender and race in the urban fire service. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Janet H. 2001. Firefighters hail women's response on September 11; Female role untold, pair say. The Plain Dealer, October 12.Google Scholar
Clayton, Susan D., and Crosby, Faye J. 1992. justice, gender, and affirmative action. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Stacey, and Grauerholz, Elizabeth. 1991. Sexual victimization among sorority women: Exploring the link between sexual violence and institutional practices. Sex Roles 24(1/2): 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, Suzanne. 1986. Sex bias lingers in firehouses of New York. The New York Times. December 8.Google Scholar
Deaux, Kay. 1995. How basic can you be? The evolution of research on gender stereotypes. journal of Social Issues 51(1): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuLong, Jessica. 2001. Women at work; Heroines of Ground Zero toil as equals alongside men. Newsday, October 21.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Jennifer, and Fiske, Susan, 1994. Affirmative action in theory and practice: Issues of power, ambiguity, and gender versus race. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 15(1/2): 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1992. Palm Beach stories. Law and Philosophy 11: 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrich, Susan. 1987. Real rape. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 1991. Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Fishman, James. 1978. Brooklyn: The limits of remedial power: Hart v. Community School Board 21. In Limits of justice: The courts' role in school desegregation, ed. Kalodner, H. and Fishman., J. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Michael. 2002. Single‐sex education gets boost; Bush plan would reverse key policy. The Washington Post. May 9.Google Scholar
Floren, Terese. 2001. Too far back for comfort. Firework: The Newsletter of Women in the Fire Service, Inc. 19(10): 1–2.Google Scholar
Frazier, Patricia, Cochran, Caroline, and Olson, Andrea. 1995. Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment, journal of Social Issues 51(1): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Alan David. 1982. Antidiscrimination law: A critical review. In The politics of law: A progressive critique, ed. Kairys, David. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Futter, Stacy, and Walter Mebane, Jr. 2001. The effects of rape law reform on rape case processing. Berkeley Women's Law journal 16: 72–129.Google Scholar
Gavey, Nicola. 1999. “I wasn't raped, but…”: Revising definitional problems in sexual victimization. In New versions of victims, ed. Lamb, Sharon. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Greengard, Samuel. 1999. Zero tolerance: Making it work. Workforce. 78(5): 28–34.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony, and Banaji, Mahzarin. 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self‐esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102(1): 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, Jack. 1977. Learning real feelings: A study of high steel ironworkers' reactions to fear and danger. Sociology of work and occupations 4(2): 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel. 1986. The conditions of discretion: Autonomy, community, bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Henderson, Lynne. 1993. Getting to know: Honoring women in law and in fact. Texas journal of Women and the Law 2: 41–73.Google Scholar
Kinsley, Michael. 1995. The spoils of victimhood. New Yorker 71(5): 62–69.Google Scholar
Kosanovich, Wendy, Rosenberg, Jill, and Swanson, Lisa. 2002. Preventing and correcting sexual harassment: A guide to the Ellerth/Faragher affirmative defense. Employee Relations Law journal 28(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sharon. 1999. Constructing the victim: Popular images and lasting labels. In New versions of victims, ed. Lamb, Sharon. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Valerie, and Marks, Helen. 1990. Sustained effects of the single‐sex secondary school experience on attitudes, behaviors, and values in college. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(3): 578–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukas, J. Anthony. 1985. Common ground: A turbulent decade in the lives of three American families. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
McCarl, Robert. 1985. The District of Columbia fire fighters' project: A case study in occupational folklife. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Milite, George. 1999. What you know about harassment can hurt you, too. HR Focus 76(12): 9–10.Google Scholar
Miller, Kay. 2002. It's hard to be a 24/7 hero. Minneapolis Star Tribune, January 13.Google Scholar
Nacoste, Rupert Barnes. 1990. Sources of stigma: Analyzing the psychology of affirmative action. Law & Policy 12(2): 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Peggy. 2001. Courage under fire. WSJ.com OpinionJournal. October 5. http://www.opinionjournal.corn/columnists/pnoonan/?id=95001272 (accessed July 3, 2002).Google Scholar
O'Beirne, Kate. 2001. Men of the hour. National Review Online. September 21. http://www.nationalreview.com/kob/092101.html (accessed July 3, 2002).Google Scholar
Ramsey, Carolyn. 1998. Subtracting sexism from the classroom: Law and policy in the debate over all‐female math and science classes in public schools. Texas Journal of Women and the Law 8(1): 1–49.Google Scholar
RAND National Defense Research Institute. 1993. Sexual orientation and U.S. military personnel policy: Options and assessment. Report prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
Ransome, Whitney, and Moulton, Meg Milne. 2001. Why girls' schools? The difference in girl‐centered education. Fordham Urban Law Journal. 29: 589–99.Google Scholar
Remick, Lani Anne. 1993. Read her lips: An argument for a verbal consent standard in rape. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141: 1103–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, Norma M. 1990. Women, minorities, and unions in the public sector. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Roiphe, Katie. 1993. The morning after: Sex, fear, and feminism on campus. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Schemo, Diana. 2002. White House proposes new view of education law to encourage single‐sex schools. The New York Times. May 9.Google Scholar
Schubot, David. 2001. Date rape prevalence among female high school students in a rural midwestern state during 1993, 1995, and 1997. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 16 (4): 291–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searles, Patricia, and Berger, Ronald. 1987. The current status of rape reform legislation: An examination of state statutes. Women's Rights Law Reporter 10(1): 25–43.Google Scholar
Sefton, Dru. 2001. In the images after Sept. 11, women firefighters sense a setback. New‐house News Service, http://www.newhouse.com/archive/storylal21101.html (accessed June 14, 2002).Google Scholar
Shmurak, Carole B. 1998. Voices of hope: Adolescent girls at single‐sex and coeducational schools. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sommers, Christina Hoff. 2000. Victims of androgyny: How feminist schooling harms boys. The American Enterprise 11(4): 20–25.Google Scholar
Sommers, Christina Hoff. 1994. Who stole feminism? OHow women have betrayed women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Steele, Shelby. 1990. The content of our character. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Seth. 2001. Women firefighters struggle for first rung. The Christian Science Monitor. December 3.Google Scholar
Strauss, Marcy. 1990. Sexist speech in the workplace. Harvard Civil RightS'Civil Liberties Law Review 25: 1–51.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan. 2001. Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review 101: 458–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swim, Janet, Aikin, Kathryn, Hall, Wayne, and Hunter, Barbara. 1995. Sexism and racism: Old‐fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Marylee. 1994. Impact of affirmative action on beneficiary groups: Evidence from the 1990 General Social Survey. Basic and Applied Psychology 15(1&2): 143–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turley, Jonathan. 2002. Airbrushing history with divisiveness. Los Angeles Times, January 18.Google Scholar
Turner, Marlene, and Pratkanis, Anthony 1994. Affirmative action as help: A review of recipient reactions to preferential selection and affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 15(1&2): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1990. EEO File: United States, detailed occupation by sex by race. CD ROM File.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2001. Household data annual averages, 2001: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic origin, http://www.bls.gov/cps/ (accessed June 14, 2002).Google Scholar
Valian, Virginia. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weatherley, Richard. 1979. Reforming special education: Policy implementation from state level to street level. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1990. Oppression and victimization; choice and responsibility. Hypatia 5(3): 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willing, Linda. 2001. The language of inclusion. Firework: The Newsletter of Women in the Fire Service, Inc. 19(10): 2–3.Google Scholar
Wolf, Naomi. 1993. Fire with fire: The new female power and how to use it. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar