Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:28:26.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“What Else Can I Do But Write?” Discursive Disruption and the Ethics of Style in Virginia Woolf's Three Guineas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

This essay suggests that to understand the pacifist position Woolf takes in her critique of fascism and patriarchy, it is essential to recognize how, not only why, she explores the relationship between narrative and political authority. Creating an intersection between a feminist conceptualization of Woolf's narrative technique and philosophical notions about ethical forms of representation, it argues that Woolf fragments the locus of narrative authority in Three Guineas to model a stylistic resistance to linguistic practices she thinks support totalitarian ideology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Matthew. 1932. Culture and anarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bahktin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Stephen. 1996. Virginia Woolf and the male moderns. In Virginia Woolf: Texts and contexts, ed. Daugherty, Beth Rigel and Barrett, Eileen. New York: Pace University Press.Google Scholar
Carlston, Erin G. 1988. Another country: Virginia Woolfapos;s disloyalty to civilization. In Thinking fascism: Sapphic modernity and fascist modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Caughie, Pamela L. 1991. Virginia Woolf and postmodernism: Literature in quest and question of itself. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Comstock, Margaret. 1977. The loudspeaker and the human voice. Bulletin of the New York Public Library 80 (2): 252–75.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Rachel Blau. 1989. Woolfenstein. In Breaking the sequence: Womenapos;s experimental fiction, ed. Friedman, Ellen G. and Fuchs, Miriam. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Flory, Wendy. 1989. The American Ezra Pound. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. 1942. Virginia Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Froula, Christina. 1994. St. Virginiaapos;s epistle to an English gentleman; or sex, violence, and the public sphere in Woolfapos;s Three Guineas. Tulsa Studies in Womenapos;s Literature 13: 2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaita, Raimond. 1998. Common understanding and individual voices. In Renegotiating ethics in literature, philosophy, and theory, ed. Adamson, Jane, Freadman, Richard, and Parker, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. 1988. The war of the words. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Kathryn. 1996. “Politics through different eyes”: Three Guineas and writings of members of the womenapos;s international league for peace and freedom. In Virginia Woolf: Texts and contexts, ed. Daughtery, Beth Rigel and Barrett, Eileen. New York: Pace University Press.Google Scholar
Hummel, Madeline M. 1977. From the common reader to the uncommon critic: Three Guineas and the epistolatory form. Bulletin of the New York Public Library 80 (2):151–57.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1979. Fables of aggression: Wyndham Lewis, the modernist as fascist. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Hermoine. 1997. Virginia Woolf. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lewis, Wyndham. 1964. Virginia Woolf: “Mind” and “matter” on the plane of a literary controversy. In Men Without Art. New York: Russell and Russell, Inc.Google Scholar
Lewis, Wyndham. 1972. Hitler. New York: Gordon Press.Google Scholar
London, Bette. 1991. Sans Culotte? Virginia Woolf and the future of feminist criticism. Diacritics 21 (2): 1129.10.2307/465188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longenbach, James. 1989. The men and women of 1914. In Arms and the woman: War, gender, and literary representation, ed. Cooper, Helen M., Auslanler Munich, Adrienne, and Squier, Susan Merril. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Low, Lisa. 1997. Refusing to hit back: Virginia Woolf and the impersonality question. In Virginia Woolf and the essay, ed. Rosenberg, Beth Carole and Dubino, Jeanne, New York: St. Martinapos;s Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, Janet. 1992. Militant discourse, strange bedfellows: Suffragettes and vortricists before the war. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4 (2): 100133.Google Scholar
Marcus, Jane. 1988. Art and anger. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, Victoria. 1979. The years: “A deliberate failure.” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 80 (2): 158–71.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, Merry M. 1995. Reassessing modernism: Virginia Woolf, Three Guineas, and fascist ideology. Woolf Studies Annual 1: 4767.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1995. Peace in our time: Learning to learn from Virginia Woolf. In Re: reading, re: writing, re: teaching Virginia Woolf, ed. Barrett, Eileen and Cramer, Patricia. New York: Pace University Press.Google Scholar
Sandbach‐Dahlstrom, Catherine. 1997. “Que scais‐je?” Virginia Woolf and the essay as feminist critique. In Virginia Woolf and the essay, ed. Rosenberg, Beth Carole and Dubino, Jeanne. New York: St. Martinapos;s Press.Google Scholar
Schlack, Beverly Ann. 1977. Virginia Woolfapos;s strategy of scorn in The Years and Three Guineas. Bulletin of the New York Public Library 80 (2): 146–50.Google Scholar
Silver, Brenda. 1983. Three Guineas before and after: Further answers to correspondents. In Virginia Woolf: A feminist slant, ed. Marcus, Jane. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Silver, Brenda. 1991. The authority of anger: Three Guineas as case study. Signs. 16 (2): 340–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Williams. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Harpercollins.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1929. A room of oneapos;s own. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1938. Three guineas. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1954. A writerapos;s diary. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1966. Thoughts on peace in an air raid. In The collected essays of Virginia Woolf. Vol. 4. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1966. The years. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1984. The diary of Virginia Woolf. Vols. 3 and 5. Ed Bell, Anne Olivier. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1988. The letters of Virginia Woolf. Vols. 2, 5, and 6. Ed Nicolson, Nigel and Trautmann, Joanne, New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Zwerdling, Alex. 1986. Virginia Woolf and the real world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar