Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:31:03.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vulnerability by Marriage: Okin's Radical Feminist Critique of Structural Gender Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Michaele L. Ferguson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The central thesis of Susan Okin's Justice, Gender, and the Family—that the ideology of the traditional family is the linchpin of contemporary gender inequality in the US—remains significant more than a quarter‐century after the book's publication. On a political register, Okin's insistence on structural analysis of gender inequality is an important corrective to recent mainstream feminist emphasis on individual women's choices. On an academic register, her work reveals the incoherence of scholarly classifications of feminist theories as “liberal feminist” or “radical feminist” by confounding such distinctions. I argue that her thesis is best understood in relation to the early radical feminism of Juliet Mitchell's Woman's Estate, a book Okin praised. Placing Okin's work in the context of its radical roots clarifies her “linchpin thesis,” but also reveals the limitations of her argument: in her emphasis on what Iris Young has termed the “distributive paradigm of justice,” Okin unnecessarily adopts a much narrower definition of the family than did Mitchell, and overestimates the influence of economic vulnerability after divorce on women's capacity to exit marriage. I suggest modifications to her theory, and conclude by showing the continuing relevance of her argument for analyzing recent legal, policy, and demographic shifts.

Type
Cluster on Susan Moller Okin's Justice, Gender, and the Family
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , Summer 2016 , pp. 687 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baehr, Amy R., ed. 2004. Varieties of feminist liberalism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1992. Okin on justice, gender, and family. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (2): 263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2009. A matter of demolition? Susan Okin on justice and gender. In Toward a humanist justice: The political philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, ed. Satz, Debra and Reich, Rob. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeParle, Jason, and Tavernise, Sabrina. 2012. For women under 30, most births occur outside marriage. The New York Times, February 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/us/for-women-under-30-most-births-occur-outside-marriage.html (accessed January 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1992. Begging to differ. The Hastings Center Report 22 (1): 47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1995. Race/gender and the ethics of difference: A reply to Okin's “Gender inequality and cultural differences”. Political Theory 23 (3): 500–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1991. Justice, gender, and the family by Susan Moller Okin. Political Theory 19 (2): 299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshman, Linda R. 2006. Get to work: A manifesto for women of the world. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1999. My culture made me do it. In Is multiculturalism bad for women?, ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, Nussbaum, Martha C., and Okin, Susan Moller. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 2009. Okin and the challenge of essentialism. In Toward a humanist justice: The political philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, ed. Satz, Debra and Reich, Rob. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1991. Rethinking the family. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1): 77–97.Google Scholar
Livingston, Gretchen. 2014. Growing number of dads home with the kids. Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/06/05/growing-number-of-dads-home-with-the-kids/#fn-19605-1 (accessed January 15, 2016).Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose, Fowler, James H., and Christakis, Nicholas A. 2013. Breaking up is hard to do, unless everyone else is doing it too: Social network effects on divorce in a longitudinal sample. Social Forces 92 (2): 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Juliet. 1971/2015. Woman's estate. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Munch, Cristin. 2014. Disentangling gender, childcare, flextime, and flexplace: Who gets penalized for flexible work? American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, Calif., August.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1979/1992. Women in western political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1984. Review of Feminist theory: A critique of ideology, ed. Nanerl Keohane et al. Ethics 94: 723–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. Reply. In Is multiculturalism bad for women?, ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, Nussbaum, Martha C., and Okin, Susan Moller. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2010. The decline of marriage and rise of new families. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/11/pew-social-trends-2010-families.pdf (accessed January 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2014. After decades of decline, a rise in stay‐at‐home mothers. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2014/04/Moms-At-Home_04-08-2014.pdf (accessed January 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. 2009. Okin's liberal feminism as a radical political theory. In Toward a humanist justice: The political philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, ed. Satz, Debra and Reich, Rob. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Sheryl. 2013. Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Sayer, Liana C., England, Paula, Allison, Paul, and Kangas, Nicole. 2011. She left, he left: How employment and satisfaction affect women's and men's decisions to leave marriages. American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 1982–2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Wendy, Parker, Kim, and Taylor, Paul. 2013. Breadwinner moms. Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/29/breadwinner-moms/ (accessed January 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Wingrove, Elizabeth. 2009. Of linchpins and other interpretive tools: Reconsidering Okin's method. In Toward a humanist justice: The political philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, ed. Satz, Debra and Reich, Rob. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Reflections on families in the age of Murphy Brown: On justice, gender, and sexuality. In Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar