Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:11:13.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unity and Difference: A Critical Appraisal of Polarizing Gender Identities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Stephanie Adair
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In The Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel draws out the interdependency of unity and difference. In order to have a unity, there must be differences that compose it, as a unity unifies different elements. At the same time, in unifying these elements, they must not cease to be different from one another, as that would reduce the unity to a simple singularity.

In this paper, I take up this interdependency of unity and difference, applying it to gender identities. I follow the psychoanalytically oriented exchange between Judith Butler and Adam Phillips, in which they agree that gender identities are a farce, superimposed upon ungendered subjects, but disagree about the extent to which this artificial binary should be disassembled. Picking up their conversation at this point, I investigate how binary systems of identity can be both injurious and useful. Should they be cast off or does it make sense to keep them? Following this vein of thought, I end with a discussion of good and bad hate, arguing that there is an inescapable need for psychologically productive hate neutralized through empathy.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , Fall 2012 , pp. 847 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy. 1995. Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1987. Subjects of desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender troubles. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. A “bad writer” bites back. New York Times, March 20.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 1998. The bad writing contest. http://denisdutton.com/bad_writing.htm (accessed December 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Epstein, Barbara. 1995. Why poststructuralism is a dead end for progressive thought. Socialist Review 25 (2): 83–119.Google Scholar
Evans, Fred. 2009. The multivoiced body. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Random House, Vintage Books Edition.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1925/2006. “Negation.” In The Penguin Freud reader, ed. Phillips, Adam. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1960. The ego and the id. Trans. Riviere, Joan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1962. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Trans. Strachey, James. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie. 1992. Vested interests: Cross‐dressing and cultural anxiety. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jay R., and Mitchell, Stephen A. 1983. Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. Miller, A.V.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Carrie. 2006. The ontology of sex: A critical inquiry into the deconstruction and reconstruction of categories. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirby, Vicki. 2006. Judith Butler: Live theory. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, Terry. 2000. Feminisms transformed? Post‐structuralism and postmodernism. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. ed. Turner, Bryan S.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nobus, Danny, and Quinn, Malcolm. 2005. Knowing nothing, staying stupid: Elements for a psychoanalytic epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. The professor of parody. http://www.akad.se/Nussbaum.pdf (accessed December 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Phillips, Adam. 1994. On flirtation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riviere, Joan, and Klein, Melanie. 1964. Love, hate and reparation. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Salih, Sara, ed., with Butler, Judith. 2008. The Judith Butler reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. 1971. Playing and reality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar