Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T17:20:59.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thoughts on the Bioethics of Estranged Biological Kin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Lisa Cassidy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the bioethics of estranged biological kin, who are biologically related people not in contact with one another (due to adoption, abandonment, or other long‐term estrangement). Specifically, I am interested in what is owed to estranged biological kin in the event of medical need. A survey of current bioethics demonstrates that most analyses are not prepared to reckon with the complications of having or being estranged biological kin. For example, adoptees might wonder if a lack of contact with biological kin could someday affect their medical care (or affect the medical care of their biological relatives).

Estranged biological kin, such as adoptees, present us with a chance to think about human connection. After sketching several organ‐donation and adoption tropes, I argue that a feminist analysis of vulnerability and dependency is helpful for understanding the confusing ties of estranged biological kin. I conclude by proposing a medical registry that would put adoptees and others in touch with their estranged biological kin on a medically as‐needed basis.

Type
Further Essays on Embodiment
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Winter 2013 , pp. 32 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, T. 2003. Gamete donation and parental responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1): 78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benetar, D. 1999. The unbearable lightness of bringing into being. Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2): 175.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The power of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. 1991. Bioethics and fatherhood. Utah Law Review 3: 735–46.Google Scholar
Cassidy, L. 2002. My mother's daughter: Thoughts about adoption. In Knowledge, power, gender: Philosophy and the future of the condition feminine, ed. Christensen, B.Zurich: Chronos Publishers.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. 1999. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crouch, R., and Elliott, C. 1999. Moral agency and the family: The case of living related organ transplantation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8: 275–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donor Sibling Registry Network. 2009. Educating, connecting, and supporting donor families. Nederland, CO. http://www.donorsiblingregistry.com/ (accessed January 25, 2009).Google Scholar
Evan. B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. 2009. Overview of adoption in the United States. New York. http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/FactOverview.html#8 (accessed January 12, 2009).Google Scholar
Finn, R. 2000. Organ transplants: Making the most of your life. New York: Patient Centered Guides.Google Scholar
Fox, R. C., and Swazey, J. P. 1992. Spare parts: Organ replacement in American society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuscaldo, G. 2006. Genetic ties: Are they morally binding? Bioethics 20 (2): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Good Morning America. March 16, 2007. Los Angeles TV anchor donates his kidney to save a friend. ABC News. New York. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnlyinAmerica/story?id=2956788&page=1 (accessed June 4, 2008).Google Scholar
Goodin, R. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1990. What about the family? The Hastings Center Report 20 (2): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslanger, S., and Witt, C., eds. 2005. Introduction. In Adoption matters: Philosophical and feminist essays. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. 1991. What does it mean to be a “parent”? The claims of biology as the basis of parental rights. New York University Law Review 66: 353–420.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirschner, D. 2006. Adoption: Uncharted waters. Woodbury, N.Y.: Juneau Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klug, C., and Jackson, with S. 2004. To the edge and back: My story from organ transplant survivor to Olympic snowboarder. Cambridge, Mass.: DaCapo Press.Google Scholar
Leighton, Kimberly. 2011. Genealogical bewilderment: Ethics, adoption, and the uncertainties of heredity. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Lindemann Nelson, H., and Lindemann Nelson, J. 1995. The patient in the family: An ethics of medicine and families. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. 1999. Adoption controversies. CQ Researcher, 9, 777–800. http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/cqresrre1999091000 (accessed September 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Matching Donors. 2010. About matchingdonors.com. http://www.matchingdonors.com/life/index.cfm?page=main&frm=about&cfid=7835310&cftoken=36359201 (accessedJune 30, 2010).Google Scholar
Meyers, D. T. 1993. Introduction to family life and moral theory. In Kindred matters: Rethinking the philosophy of the family, ed. Meyers, D., Kipnis, K. and Murphy, C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mullin, A. 2005. Reconceiving pregnancy and childcare: Ethics, experience, and reproductive labor. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. 1991. Parental obligations and the ethics of surrogacy: A causal perspective. Public Affairs Quarterly 5: 49–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Obama, B. 1995. Dreams from my father: A story of race and inheritance. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Pelikan, J., and Levy, J. 2003. Our chosen child: How you came to us and the growing up years. Riverside, N.J.: Andrews McMeel Publishing.Google Scholar
Pertman, A. 2001. Adoption nation: How the adoption revolution is transforming America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Price, D. 2000. Legal and ethical aspects of organ donation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, A. 1977. Of woman born: Motherhood as an experience and institution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rothman, B. K. 1989. Recreating motherhood. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruddick, S. 1995. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Satel, S. 2007. Desperately seeking a kidney. New York Times Magazine, December 16.Google Scholar
Turner, B. 1987. Medical power and social knowledge. London: Sage Press.Google Scholar
United Network for Organ Sharing. 2009. Data on waiting list candidates. http://www.unos.org/ (accessed February 28, 2009).Google Scholar
Walker, M. U. 1998. Moral understandings: A feminist study in ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar