Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:38:31.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

This Body Which Is Not One: Speaking an Embodied Self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Elspeth Probyn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues against a conception of the body as providing a basis for truth claims within feminist discourse. Taking from Michèle Le Doeuffs theory of the work of the image within discourse, and Michel Foucault's “technologies of the self,” it is argued that the doubledness of the body (“who am I? and who is she?”) can be put to work to construct embodied enunicative positions within feminist theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 6 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Feminism and the Body , Fall 1991 , pp. 111 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althusser, Louis and Balibar, Etienne. 1970. Reading capital. Brewster, Ben, trans. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1982. A l'ombre des majorities silencieuses ou la fin du social. Paris: Editions Denoel/Gonthier.Google Scholar
Bland, Lucy, McCabe, Trisha, and Mort, Frank. 1979. Sexuality and reproduction: Three “official” instances. In Ideology and cultural production. Barrett, Michèle, Corrigan, Philip, Kuhn, Annette, and Wolff, Janet, eds. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1989. The politics of ontological difference. In Between feminism and psychoanalysis. Brennan, Teresa, ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Beverley and Adams, Parveen. 1979. The feminine body and feminist politics. m/f 3: 35–50.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Foucault. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. Pourparlers. Paris: Editions du Minuit.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1985. Sexuality and solitude. In On signs. Blonsky, Marshall, ed. Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1986. The use of pleasure. Vol. 2 of The history of sexuality. Hurley, Robert, trans. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. Technologies of the self. Martin, Luther H., Gutman, Huck, and Hutton, Patrick H., eds. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1989. Resumé des cours. Paris: Julliard.Google Scholar
Frank, Arthur W. 1990. Bringing bodies back in: A decade in review. Theory, Culture & Society 7:131–162.10.1177/026327690007001007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1989. The monster in the mirror: The feminist critic's pyschoanalysis. In Feminism and psychoanalysis. Feldstein, Richard and Roof, Judith, eds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1990. Cultural identity and diaspora. In Identity, community, culture, difference. Rutherford, Jonathan, ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Huyssen, Andreas. 1986. After the great divide: Modernism, mass culture, postmodernism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroker, Arthur, and Kroker, Marilouise. 1987. Panic sex in America. In Body invaders: Panic sex in America. Kroker, and Kroker, , eds. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 198182. Pierre Roussel's chiasmas. Ideology and Consciousness 9: 39–70.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 1989. L'étude et le rouet. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1986. Le postmoderne expliqué aux enfants. Paris: Editions Galilée.Google Scholar
Martin, Biddy. 1988. Lesbian identity and autobiographical difference(s). In Life/lines: Theorizing women's autobiography. Brodski, Bella and Schenck, Celeste, eds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Meaghan. 1988. Operative reasoning: Reading Michèle Le Doeuff. In her The pirate's fiancée: Feminism reading postmodernism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Owens, Craig. 1983. The discourse of others: Feminists and postmodernism. In The Anti‐aesthetic. Foster, Hal, ed. Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Probyn, Elspeth. forthcoming. Sexing the self: Speaking positions in feminist discourse. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul. 1988. Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Szekely, Eva. 1988. Never too thin. Toronto: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1961. The long revolution. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. 10.7312/will93760CrossRefGoogle Scholar