Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:26:24.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking with Beauvoir on the Freedom of the Child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Lior Levy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among philosophers, Simone de Beauvoir is unique in treating childhood as a philosophical phenomenon. In both The Ethics of Ambiguity and The Second Sex, she examines the relationship between childhood and human freedom and considers its role in the development of subjectivity. Despite this, few sustained analyses of her treatment of the phenomenon exist. I argue that Beauvoir's conception of childhood is not uniform, but changes from The Ethics of Ambiguity to The Second Sex. Whereas the former presents children as lacking moral freedom, as not fully sovereign individuals, the latter suggests that children are just as free as adults. When children do not fully possess or exercise freedom, it is not because they are not in a position to do so, but rather because various social institutions hinder them. I find this position useful for developing a phenomenological account of childhood as a site for freedom. Hence, Beauvoir becomes a source for thinking of issues in philosophical anthropology concerning the temporality of human existence and the nature of human agency over a lifespan.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Winter 2016 , pp. 140 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1996. Politics, trans. S. Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2012. Eudemian ethics, trans. B. Inwood and R. Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arp, Kristana. 2001. The bonds of freedom. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2000. The ethics of ambiguity, trans. B. Frechtman. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2010. The second sex, trans. C. Borde and S. Malovany‐Chevallier. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Bergoffen, Debra B. 1995. Out from under: Beauvoir's philosophy of the erotic. In Feminist interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Simons, M. A.University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Thomas W. 2005. Simone de Beauvoir on achieving subjectivity. In The contradictions of freedom, ed. Scholz, S. J. and Mussett, S. M.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Eshleman, Matthew C. 2009. Beauvoir and Sartre on freedom, intersubjectivity, and normative justification. In Beauvoir and Sartre: The riddle of influence, ed. Daigle, C. and Golomb, J.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 2012. Civilization and its discontents, ed. Starchy, J.New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
James, Allison, and James, Adrian. 2008. Key concepts in childhood studies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Mahler, Margaret S. 2000. The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1956. Being and nothingness, trans. H. Barnes. New York and London: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Scarth, Fredrika. 2004. The other within. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar. 1999. What is a child? Ethics 109 (4): 715–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, Sally. 2010. That all children should be free: Beauvoir, Rousseau, and childhood. Hypatia 25 (2): 394–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simms, Eva. M. 2008. The child in the world. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2014. Simone de Beauvoir's philosophy of age. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar