Article contents
Abstract
In this article I discuss the argument/criticismi'concerns of bisexuality that arise from within progressive communities which already accept gay and lesbian rights. Issues discussed include trust, heterosexuality and the body, the power dynamics of patriarchal oppression and subjective verification. The moon is evoked as a material metaphor for phases and changes. 1 argue that conditions of the world preclude political attachment to an excessively fixed standard of many things, including sexual orientation.
- Type
- Third Frequencies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Burchard, Melissa. 1996. The myths of bisexuality. Paper presented at the Second National Conference of the Radical Philosophy Association, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Heldke, Lisa. 1997. In praise of unreliability. Hypatia 12(3): 174–182.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00011.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldke, Lisa and O'Connor, Peg. 1996. Null. Paper presented at the Second National Conference of the Radical Philosophy Association, Purdue University.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Peg. 1997. Warning! Contents under heterosexual pressure. Hypatia 12(3): 183–188.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00012.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, Abby. 1997. Ending at the skin: Sexuality and race in feminist theorizing. Hypatia 12(3): 164–173.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00010.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zita, Jacqueline. 1996. Fiddling with preference. Paper presented at the Spring Meeting of the Midwest Society for Women in Philosophy.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by