Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:38:04.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation and the Reproduction of Injustice: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Patrick D. Hopkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Melinda Vadas rejects my claim that there are morally relevant differences between simulations of unjust events and actual unjust events on the ground that I overlook the connection between simulations and that which they simulate. I argue that this purported moral connection can only be understood as either the result of a necessary psychological disposition or as a “magical,” metaphysical attachment, neither of which is defensible or satisfactory.

Type
Comment/Reply
Information
Hypatia , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Spring 1995 , pp. 162 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hopkins, Patrick D. 1994. Rethinking sadomasochism: Feminism, interpretation, and simulation. Hypatia 9(1): 116–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick. 1993. Commentary on Claudia Card and Patrick Hopkins. Commentary presented at symposium on philosophical perspectives on SM sex at the American Philosophical Association meeting, December 1993.Google Scholar
Vadas, Melinda. 1995. Reply to Patrick Hopkins. Hypatia 10(2): 159–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar