Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:34:22.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sexual Division of Labor and the Split Paycheck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Nancy J. Hirschmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay takes up an apparently minor idea of Susan Moller Okin's Justice, Gender, and the Family—that employers should split the paycheck of wage‐earning husbands between employees and their stay‐at‐home spouses—and suggests that it actually threatens to undermine Okin's entire argument by perpetuating the most central cause of women's inequality by Okin's own account: the sexual division of labor. Recognizing the vital contributions that Okin's seminal work made and the impact that it had on the field of feminist philosophy and political theory, the essay explores the ethical, political, and philosophical problems with this solution to the dire problems of gender inequality and injustice that Okin correctly identifies. The essay suggests that her commitment to liberalism may have resulted in a commitment to an inadequate vision of how to solve the problems of gender inequality, and offers other possibilities that Okin could have pursued instead that sustain her strong commitment to liberalism.

Type
Cluster on Susan Moller Okin's Justice, Gender, and the Family
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , Summer 2016 , pp. 651 - 667
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, Ruth. 2011. The return of feminist liberalism. Durham, UK: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar
Barclay, Linda. 2013. Liberal daddy quotas: Why men should take care of the children, and how liberals can get them to do it. Hypatia 28 (1): 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 2010. The second sex. Trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany‐Chevallier. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Belkin, Lisa. 2003. The opt‐out revolution. The New York Times, October 26.Google Scholar
Blau, Francine D., Ferber, Marianne A., and Winkler, Anne E. 2010. The economics of women, men, and work, 6th edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chesler, Phyllis. 2011. Mothers on trial: The battle for children and custody, 2nd edition. Chicago: Chicago Review Press.Google Scholar
Cudd, Ann E. 1998. Strikes, housework, and the moral obligation to resist. Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (1): 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa, and James, Selma. 1975. The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol, UK: Falling Wall Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Eichner, Maxine. 2010. The supportive state: Families, government, and America's political ideals. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man/private woman: Women in social and political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández, Raquel, Fogli, Alessandra, and Olivetti, Claudia. 2004. Mothers and sons: Preference formation and female labor force dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (4): 1249–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Raquel, and Wong, Joyce Cheng. 2014. Divorce risk, wages and working wives: A quantitative life‐cycle analysis of female labour force participation. Economic Journal 124 (May): 319–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1991. The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy. 2002. The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2013. How feminism became capitalism's handmaiden—and how to reclaim it. The Guardian, October 14.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1994. A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the US welfare state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19 (2): 309–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1900. Women and economics. Boston: Small, Maynard and Co.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1994. Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare 1890–1935. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet, and Meyers, Marcia. 2003. Families that work: Politics for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. Money, sex, and power: Toward a feminist historical materialism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1999. Difference as an occasion for rights: A feminist rethinking of rights, liberalism, and difference. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (1): 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The subject of liberty: Toward a feminist theory of freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2008. Wed to the problem? The place of men and state in families. The Good Society 17 (1): 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2015. Equality, freedom and the sexual division of labour. Visions on Gender Equality, ed. Sansonetti, Silvia and Bettio, Francesca, produced by ENEGE: Network of Experts in the Field of Gender Equality for the European Commission, DG Justice Unit D2.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russel, and Machung, Anne. 1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russel, and Machung, Anne. 2001. The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jennet, Ferguson, Michaele, Marso, Lori, Snyder‐Hall, Claire, and Hirschmann, Nancy. 2010. Selling out? Solidarity and choice in the American feminist movement. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 241–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Elizabeth K., and Bickford, Susan. 2014. Constructing freedom: Institutional pathways to changing the gender division of labor. Perspectives on Politics 12 (1): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Mary Ann. 2011. The pyramid problem. Chronicle of Higher Education, March 9.Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C. 2006. The place of families: Fostering capacity, equality, and responsibility. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Claire Cain. 2015. Mounting evidence of advantages for children of working mothers. New York Times, May 15. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/upshot/mounting-evidence-of-some-advantages-for-children-of-working-mothers.html?ref=topics&_r=0 (accessed May 15, 2015).Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's end. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mixon, Bobbie. 2008. Chore wars: Men, women and housework. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, April 28. http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=111458 (accessed September 27, 2014).Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. Boston: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1990. Feminism, the individual, and contract theory: The sexual contract. Ethics 100 (3): 658–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 2005. “Forty acres and a mule” for women: Rawls and feminism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2): 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller, Joshua, Cohen, Matthew, Howard, Martha Craven, Nussbaum, eds. 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for women?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. Raising kids and running a household: How working parents share the load. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center (November). http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/11/04/raising-kids-and-running-a-household-how-working-parents-share-the-load/ (accessed November 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Pew Research and Social Demographic Trends. 2013. On pay gap, millennial women near parity—for now, chap. 1, “Trends from government data,” and chap. 5, “Balancing work and family.” Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center (December 11). http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/12/11/chapter-5-balancing-work-and-family/ (accessed September 27, 2014).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1997. The idea of public reason revisited. University of Chicago Law Review 64 (3): 765–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, Steven E., and Rhoads, Christopher H. 2012. Gender roles and infant/toddler care: Male and female professors on the tenure track. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 6 (1): 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. 2009. Okin's liberal feminism as a radical political theory. In Toward a humanist justice: The political philosophy of Susan Moller Okin, ed. Satz, Debra and Reich, Rob. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sarah. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, Brigid. 2014. The second shift at 25: Q and A with Arlie Hochschild. The New York Times, August 6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/08/06/the-second-shift-at-25-q-a-with-arlie-hochschild/ (accessed October 10, 2015).Google Scholar
Thompson, Sharon. 2015. Prenuptial agreements and the presumption of free choice: Issues of power in theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014. Household Activities in 2013, American Time Use 2013. Washington D.C.: US Bureau of Labor Statistics(June 18) http://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.nr0.htm (accessed September 27, 2014).Google Scholar