Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T19:08:28.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstructing Judgment: Emotion and Moral Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Kathleen Wallace
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A traditional association of judgment with “reason” has drawn upon and reinforced an opposition between reason and emotion. This, in turn, has led to a restricted view of the nature of moral judgment and of the subject as moral agent. The alternative, I suggest, is to abandon the traditional categories and to develop a new theory of judgment. I argue that the theory of judgment developed by Justus Buchler constitutes a robust alternative which does not prejudice the case against emotion. Drawing on this theory I then develop how to conceptualize the ways in which feeling and emotion can be (or be components of) moral judgments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 61 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. L. 1975. How to do things with words 2d ed., ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisa, Marina. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96: 231–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1987. The need for more than justice. In Science, morality and feminist theory, ed. Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia. 1984. The alleged moral repugnance of acting from duty. Journal of Philosophy 81(4): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. 1974. The conscience of Huckleberry Finn. Philosophy 49 (188): 123–34.10.1017/S0031819100048014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1980. Friendship, altruism and morality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1982. Kant's and Hegel's moral rationalism: A feminist perspective. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12(2): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Buchler, Justus. 1974. The main of light: On the concept of poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchler, Justus. [1951] 1979. Toward a general theory of human judgment. New York: Dover Publications.10.7312/buch94420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchler, Justus. [1955] 1985. Nature and judgment. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchler, Justus. [1966] 1990. Metaphysics of natural complexes, ed. Wallace, Kathleen and Marsoobian, Armen, with Robert S. Corrington. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald. 1987. The rationality of emotion. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5760.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. [1925] 1981. Experience and nature. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works: 1925–1953, Vol. 1, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. [1922] 1983. Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works: 1899–1924, Vol. 14, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. [1929] 1984a. The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works: 1925–53, Vol. 4, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. [1894] 1984b. The theory of emotion. Excerpt reprinted in What is an emotion?, ed. Calhoun, Chesire and Solomon, Robert C.New York: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted in 1971. John Dewey: The early works: 1882–1898, Vol. 4, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.).Google Scholar
Dewey, John. [1932] 1985. The theory of the moral life. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works: 1925–53, Vol. 7, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. [1938] 1986. Logic: The theory of inquiry. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works: 1925–53, Vol. 12, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John and Tufts, James H. [1908] 1978. Ethics. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works: 1899–1924. Vol. 5, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1983. Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: A psychoanalytic perspective on epistemology and metaphysics. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Giarelli, James M. and Chambliss, J. J. 1989. John Dewey on moral development and education: Context, conception and legacy. Discourse 9(2): 82–104.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol and Wiggins, Grant. 1988. The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In Mapping the moral domain: New images of self in relationship, ed. Gilligan, Carol, Ward, Janie, and Taylor, Jill. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1983. The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1, Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. 1983. Morality and conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virgina. 1990. Feminist transformations of moral theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (Supplement): 321–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 1981. On the value of acting from the motive of duty. Philosophical Review 90(3): 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinman, Lawrence M. 1983. On the purity of our moral motives: a critique of Kant's account of the emotions and acting for the sake of duty. Monist 66(2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagger, Alison. 1989. Love and knowledge: emotion in feminist epistemology. In Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1948. Essays in pragmatism. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. 1988. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1981. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals, trans. Ellington, James W.Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Keller, E. F. 1984. Gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981. Essays on moral development. Vol. 1, The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence and with Charles Levine Alexandra Hewer. 1984. Moral stages: A current statement. Response to critics. Appendix A. In Essays on moral development. Vol. 2, The psychology of moral development, by Lawrence Kohlberg, 207–386, 621–39. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
McClain, Linda. 1992. “Atomistic man” revisited: Liberalism, connection, and feminist jurisprudence. Southern California Law Review 65 (3): 1171–1264.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Norton, David Fate. 1974. Hutcheson's moral sense theory reconsidered. Dialogue 13: 3–23.10.1017/S0012217300025105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, David Fate. 1982. David Hume: Common‐sense moralist, sceptical metaphysician. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99 (2): 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Gregory F. 1992. Dewey and feminism: The affective and relationships in Dewey's ethics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy, March.Google Scholar
Pierce, Charles Sanders. 1931-58. Collected papers, ed. Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and Burks, A.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1983. Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9 (1): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, Robin M. 1988. Cognition and eros: A critique of the Kantian paradigm. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1989. Pragmatism, feminism, and sensitivity to context. In Who cares? Theory, research, and educational implications of the ethic of care, ed. Brabeck, Mary M.New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1991. Where are all the pragmatist feminists? Hypatia 6 (2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Beth J. 1983. Ordinal naturalism: An introduction to the philosophy of Justus Buchler. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. [1973]1980. Emotions and choice. The Review of Metaphysics, 17 (1). Reprinted in Explaining emotions, ed. Rorty, Amèlie O.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press: 251–81.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. [1976] 1983. The passions: The myth and nature of human emotion. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday. Reprint. Notre Dame University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael. 1976. The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories. Journal of Philosophy 73 (4): 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Anthony. 1984. Toward the reconstruction of subjectivism: Love as a paradigm of values. Journal of Value Inquiry 18:181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1962. The idea of equality. In Philosophy, politics and society, ed. Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1982. Moral saints. Journal of Philosophy 79 (8): 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul. 1977. Understanding Rawls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1987. Impartiality and the civic public. In Feminism as critique, ed. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla, 55–76, nn. 171–74. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar