Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:46:36.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reason and Sensibility: The Ideal of Women's Self-Governance in die Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Catriona Mackenzie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is standard in feminist commentaries to argue that Wollstonecraft's feminism is vitiated by her commitment to a liberal philosophical framework, relying on a valuation of reason over passion and on the notion of a sex-neutral self. I challenge this interpretation of Wollstonecraft's feminism and argue that her attempt to articulate an ideal of self-governance for women was an attempt to diagnose and resolve some of the tensions and inadequacies within traditional liberal thought.1

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 35 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other. In Feminism as critique, ed.Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 1981. The radical future of liberal feminism. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1986. Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Nature vs. reason. In Women and philosophy, ed.Thompson, Janna. Supplement to Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(June): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991a. The oppressed state of my sex: Wollstonecraft on reason, feeling and equality. In Feminist interpretations and political theory, ed.Pateman, Carole and Shanley, Mary Lyndon. Cambridge: Polity Press; University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991b. Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on equality and difference. Cambridge: Polity Press; Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1989. Mary Wollstonecraft and the tensions in feminist philosophy. Radical Philosophy 52(Summer): 11–17.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld; Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva, and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason. London: Methuen; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Jane Roland. 1985. Reclaiming a conversation: The ideal of the educated woman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1979. Women in Western political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1989. Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1755] 1973. Discourse on the origins of inequality. In “The Social Contract” and other discourses. London: Dent (Everyman's Library).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1762] 1974. Emile. London: Dent; New York Dutton (Everyman's Library).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. [1762] 1983. On the social contract; Discourse on the origin of inequality; Discourse on political economy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Tapper, Marion. 1986. Can a feminist be a liberal? In Women and philosophy, ed.Thompson, Janna. Supplement to Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64(June): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomalin, Claire. 1974. The life and death of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Todd, Janet M., ed. 1977. A Wollstonecraft anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1792] 1975. Vindication of the rights of woman, ed.Kramnick, Miriam. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1796] 1977. Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. In A Wollstonecraft anthology, ed.Todd, Janet M.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1788] 1980a. Mary, A Fiction. In Mary and “The Wrongs of Woman,” ed.Kinsley, James and Kelly, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. [1798] 1980b. The wrongs of woman; or, Maria: A fragment. In Mary and “The wrongs of woman,” eds. Kinsley, James, and Kelly, Gary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar