Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:10:55.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenomenology of the Event: Waiting and Surprise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Françoise Dastur
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How, asks Françoise Dastur, can philosophy account for the sudden happening and the factuality of the event? Dastur asks how phenomenology, in particular the work of Heidegger, Husserl, and Merleau-Ponty, may be interpreted as offering such an account. She argues that the “paradoxical capacity of expecting surprise is always in question in phenomenology,” and for this reason, she concludes, “We should not oppose phenomenology and the thinking of the event. We should connect them; openness to phenomena must be identified with openness to unpredictability.” The article offers reflections in these terms on a phenomenology of birth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Contemporary French Women Philosophers , Fall 2000 , pp. 178 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergson, Henri 1944. Creative evolution. Trans.Mitchell, Arthur. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri 1963. Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. In Oeuvres (Edition du Centenaire) Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, W. 1991. La perte de l'évidence naturelle: Une contribution à la psychopathologie des schizophrénics pauci‐symptomatiques. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Dastur, Françoise 1997. Pour une phénoménologie de l'événement: L'attente et la surprise. Études Phénoménologiques 25: 59–75.10.5840/etudphen1997132510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goethe, Johann W. 1968. Maximen und reflexionen. Vol. 12. München: Hamburger Ausgabe.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1923. Ontologie (Hermeneutik der Faktizität). In Gesamtausgabe, Band 63. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1962. Being and time. Trans.Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1977. Vier Seminare. Klostermann: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1976. La fin de la philosophie et la tâche de pensée. In Questions IV. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1979. Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. In Gesamtausgabe, Band 20. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heraclitus, . 1987. Fragments:A text and translation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1960. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. Trans.Cairns, Dorion. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-017-4952-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1962. Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Trans.Boyce Gibson, W. R.London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1964. The idea of phenomenology. Trans.Alston, William P. and Nakhnikian, George. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1970a. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Trans.Carr, David. Evanston: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1970b. Logical investigations. Vol 1. Trans.Findlay, J. N.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1991. On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time. Trans.Brough, John Barnett. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1933. Critique of pure reason. Trans.Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lévinas, Emmanuel 1987. Time and the other. Trans.Cohen, Richard A.Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Maldiney, Henri 1991. Penser l'homme et la folie. Grenoble: J. Millon.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Trans.Smith, Colin. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1968. The visible and the invisible. Trans.Lingis, Alphonso. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Romano, Claude 1993. Le possible et l'événement. Philosophie 40(décembre 1993): 68–95.and Philosophie 41(mars 1994): 60–86.Google Scholar