Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:11:59.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performing Power in a Mystical Context: Implications for Theorizing Women's Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2020

Constance Awinpoka Akurugu
Constance Awinpoka Akurugu*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Planning and Land Management, Department of Community Development, University for Development Studies, UPW 3, Wa Campus, P.O. Box UPW 3 Wa, Ghana
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article builds on recent accounts of diffuse and complex agentic practices in the global South by drawing on ethnographic data gathered in northwestern Ghana among the Dagaaba. Contemporary feminist discourses and theories, particularly in contexts in the global South, have sought to draw attention to the multifaceted ways in which women exercise agency in these contexts. Practices that in the past were perceived as instruments of women's subordination or as re-inscribing their oppression have been re/interpreted as agentic. Agentic practices are theorized in more fluid terms than the binary pairing of agent/victim debates permit. Dagaaba contexts are deeply pervaded by beliefs in supernatural power forms, and these forces dis/empower certain forms of agentic acts. This article demonstrates that key factors combining with male power to regulate women's exercise of agency are perceived mystical forces. I argue that, in order not to risk missing agency—or rather “misdescribing” it—in the context of Dagaaba and most parts of sub-Saharan Africa, where the belief in mystical forces is profoundly pervasive, the role of these power forms as important determinants of the form that agentic practices assume—and more broadly, the way power works—needs critical attention in feminist theorizing.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , Fall 2020 , pp. 549 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1990. The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist 17 (1): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akurugu, Constance Awinpoka. 2017. Marriage, power and performativity: Theorising gender relations in rural northern Ghana. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Akurugu, Constance Awinpoka. 2019. Gender performativity in rural northern Ghana: Implications for transnational feminist theorising. Feminist Theory. doi:10.1177/1464700119881308.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, Julia, Jennifer Waltz, Neil Jacobson, and Gottman, John. 1993. Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61 (1): 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrends, Andrea. 2002. “Pogminga”— the “proper Dagara woman”: An encounter between Christian thought and Dagara concepts. Journal of Religion in Africa 32 (2): 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boddy, Janice. 1989. Wombs and alien spirits: Women, men, and the Zār cult in northern Sudan. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990/1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993a/2011. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993b. Critically queer. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 1 (1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, John, and Marcus, George, eds. 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John, eds. 1993. Modernity and its malcontents: Ritual and power in postcolonial Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John. 1999. Occult economies and the violence of abstraction: Notes from the South African postcolony. American Ethnologist 26 (2): 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrufelli, Maria Rosa. 1983. Women of Africa: Roots of oppression. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 1932/1976. Witchcraft, oracles, and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. 1978. The history of sexuality, Vol. I: An introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. 1980 Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–77, ed. Gordon, Colin; trans. Gordon, Colin, Marshall, Leo, Mepham, John, and Soper, Kate. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–95.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2003. Autonomy, gender, politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschiere, Peter. 1997. The modernity of witchcraft: Politics and the occult in postcolonial Africa. Trans. Geschiere, Peter and Roitman, Janet. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Geschiere, Peter. 2013. Witchcraft, intimacy, and trust: Africa in comparison. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Tambiah, Stanley Jeyaraja. 1973. Bridewealth and dowry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1987. Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterberger, Amy. 2013. Agency. In Gender: The key concepts, ed. Evans, Mary and Williams, Carolyn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy. 2003. The subject of liberty: Toward a feminist theory of freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hosken, Fran P. 1981. Female genital mutilation and human rights. Gender Issues 1 (2): 3–23.Google Scholar
Madhok, Sumi. 2013. Action, agency, coercion: Reformatting agency for oppressive contexts. In Gender, agency, and coercion: Thinking gender in transnational times, ed. Madhok, Sumi, Phillips, Anne, Wilson, Kalpana, and Hemmings, Clare. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhok, Sumi, Phillips, Anne, Wilson, Kalpana, and Hemmings, Clare, eds. 2013. Gender, agency, and coercion: Thinking gender in transnational times. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, Remigius. 1988. Great things happen: A personal memoir of the first Christian missionary among the Dagaabas and Sissalas of northwest Ghana. Montreal: The Society of the Missionaries of Africa.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana. 2000. Feminism and women's autonomy: The challenge of female genital cutting. Metaphilosophy 31 (5): 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Diana. 2004. Being yourself: Essays on identity, action, and social life. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Michel Foucault. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1988. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30 (Autumn): 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 2002. Minds of their own: Choices, autonomy, cultural practices, and other women. In A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity, ed. Antony, Louise M. and Witt, Charlotte E.. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skeggs, Beverly. 2001. Feminist ethnography. In Handbook of ethnography, ed. Atkinson, Paul, Amanda Coffey, Sara, Delamont, John Lofland, and Lofland, Lyn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1988. Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women's Studies International Forum 2 (1): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. Autonomy and the feminist intuition. In Relational autonomy, ed. Stoljar, Natalie and Mackenzie, Catriona. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Veltman, Andrea, and Piper, Mark, eds. 2014. Autonomy, oppression, and gender. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar