Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:22:25.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Silencing and Systematicity: The Challenge of the Drowning Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Silencing is a speech‐related harm. We here focus on one particular account of silencing offered by Jennifer Hornsby and Rae Langton. According to this account, silencing is systematically generated, illocutionary‐communicative failure (of a very specific sort). We here raise an apparent challenge to that account. In particular, we offer an example—the drowning case—that meets these conditions of silencing but does not intuitively seem to be an instance of it. First, we explore several conditions one might add to the Hornsby‐Langton account, but we argue that none are satisfactory. Then, we further explore the systematicity condition, which is insufficiently characterized in the current literature. Although we explore several promising ways to further characterize this condition, we ultimately conclude that more work needs to be done. Consequently, because this systematicity condition is under‐specified, the Hornsby‐Langton account of silencing is incomplete.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, Alexander. 2002. Illocutionary silencing. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chebbak, Nidal. 2013. Sexual harassment in Moroccan streets, who is to blame? Morocco World News, February 14. http://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2013/02/78458/sexual-harassment-in-moroccan-streets-who-is-to-blame (accessed March 29, 2015).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. Communication and convention. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of social reality: Essays in feminist theory. Freedom, Calif.: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Hammadi, Rajae. 2015. Breaking the silence: Street harassment in Morocco. The World We Want Foundation. http://theworldwewantfoundation.org/projects/breaking-silence-street-harassment-morocco.zlast (accessed March 30, 2015).Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1993. Speech acts and pornography. Women's Philosophy Review 10: 3845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer, and Langton, Rae. 1998. Free speech and illocution. Legal Theory 4: 2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel. 1995. Freedom of speech acts? A response to Langton. Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1): 6479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1993. Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4): 293330.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine, and Dworkin, Andrea, eds. 1997. In harm's way: The pornography civil rights hearings. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maitra, Ishani. 2004. Silence and responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1): 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, Ishani. 2009. Silencing speech. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (2): 309–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, Ishani, and McGowan, Mary Kate. 2010. On silencing, rape, and responsibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1): 167–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Mary Kate. 2009. On silencing and sexual refusal. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Mary Kate. 2014. Sincerity silencing. Hypatia 29 (2): 458–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Mary Kate, Adelman, Alexandra, Helmers, Sara, and Stolzenberg, Jacqueline. 2011. A partial defense of illocutionary silencing. Hypatia 26 (1): 132–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander. 1960. Free speech and its relation to government in political freedom: The constitutional powers of the people. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Mikkola, Mari. 2011. Illocution, silencing and the act of refusal. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3): 415–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1978. On liberty, edited by Rappaport, Elizabeth. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Monqid, Safaa. 2012. Violence against women in public spaces: The case of Morocco. In Local governance in the Arab world and the Mediterranean: What role for women?, ed. Denefle, Sylvette and Monqid, Safaa. Egypte/Monde Arabe 9: 105–17.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Rachel. 2008. Gendering the city, gendering the nation: Contesting urban space in Fes, Morocco. City & Society 11 (2): 288311.Google Scholar
Sadiqi, Fatima, and Ennaji, Moha. 2010. The feminization of public space: Women's activism, the family law, and social change in Morocco. Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 2 (2): 86114.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 1972. A theory of freedom of expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2): 204–26.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1982. Free speech: A philosophical enquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scoccia, Danny. 1996. Can liberals support a ban on violent pornography? Ethics 106 (4): 776–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Caroline. 2003. The free speech argument against pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3): 391422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, Nellie. 2007. Linguistic authority and convention in a speech act analysis of pornography. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3): 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, Nicole. 2009. Failing to do things with words. Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1): 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar