Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:53:40.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Feminist Work on Knowledge, Reason and Objectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

The contributors to two new anthologies A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity (edited by Louise Antony and Charlene Witt) and Feminist Epistemologies (edited by Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter) are philosophers for whom feminism is an intellectual as well as political commitment and they produce original, valuable feminist and philosophical work. I focus on differences between the anthologies and on two themes: the social character of knowledge and the allegedly oppressive “masculinism” of epistemological ideals.

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addelson, Katherine Pyne. 1992. Knowers/doers and their moral problems. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth eds. 1992. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Antony, Louise, and Witt, Charlotte, eds. 1992. A mind of one's own. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Antony, Louise. 1992. Quine as feminist: The radical import of naturalized epistemology. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Atherton, Margaret. 1992. Cartesian reason and gendered reason. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Babbitt, Susan. 1992. Feminism and objective interests: The role of transformation experiences in rational deliberation. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1992. Hume: The reflective woman's epistemologist?. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Bar‐On, Bat Ami. 1992. Marginality and epistemic privilege. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1992. Taking subjectivity into account. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Dalmiya, Vindra, and Alcoff, Linda. 1992. Are ‘old wives’ tales' justified? See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1992. Bodies and knowledges: Feminism and the crisis of reason. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1992. Rethinking standpoint epistemology. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 1992. On being objective and being objectified. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Harris, Angela. 1990. Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review 58. Reprinted in Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender, ed. Katharine T. Bartlett and Roseanne Kennedy. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 1992. Could it be worth thinking about Kant on sex and marriage? See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1992. Maleness, metaphor, and the “crisis” of reason. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1992a. Essential tensions‐‐‐Phase two: Feminist, philosophical and social studies of science. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1992b. Subjects, power and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1992. Epistemological communities. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Potter, Elizabeth. 1992. Gender and epistemic negotiation. See Alcoff and Potter.Google Scholar
Rapport, Elizabeth. 1992. Generalizing gender: Reason and essence in the legal thought of Catharine MacKinnon. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1992. Though this be method, yet there is madness in it: Paranoia and liberal epistemology. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar
Schott, Robin, 1992. Resurrecting embodiment: Toward a feminist materialism. See Antony and Witt.Google Scholar