Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:09:05.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

My Two Moms: Disability, Queer Kinship, and the Maternal Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2014

Harold Braswell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dominant Western discourses of motherhood have depicted disabled women as incapable of being mothers. In contrast to these representations, recent literature in disability studies has argued that disabled women can provide maternal care and should therefore retain custody over their children. This literature is commendable, but its emphasis on custodial rights excludes from the category of “mother” those disabled women who cannot maintain child custody. In this article, I challenge this exclusion via an account of my experience with my two mothers: my biological mother, who relinquished custody over me because of her inability to provide care, and my maternal grandmother, who raised me as her child. Theorizing this account, I argue that disability studies must adopt a conception of motherhood that recognizes both alternative kinship structures and mothers whose disabilities preclude them from fulfilling normative conceptions of maternal care. I develop such a conception by synthesizing Judith Butler's theorization of queer kinship with Donald Winnicott's rethinking of the maternal subject. I conclude by drawing on this flexible conception of motherhood to argue that my disabled mother's relinquishing of custody over me to her own mother was the very gesture in which she accepted and adopted a maternal role.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 1: Special Issue: New Conversations in Feminist Disability Studies , Winter 2015 , pp. 234 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, Judith. 2000. Antigone's claim: Kinship between life and death. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Licia. 2009. The faces of intellectual disability: Philosophical reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Desjardins, Michel. 2012. The sexualized body of the child: Parents and the politics of “voluntary” sterilization of people labeled intellectually disabled. In Sex and disability, ed. McRuer, R. and Mollow, A. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Filax, Gloria, and Taylor, Dena, eds. 2014a. Disabled mothers: Stories and scholarship by and about mothers with disabilities. Bradford, Ont.: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Filax, G., and Taylor, D. (eds.). 2014b. Introduction. In Disabled mothers: Stories and scholarship by and about mothers with disabilities, ed. Filax, G. and Taylor, D. Bradford, Ont.: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Frohmader, Carolyn, Meekosha, Helen, and Soldatic, Karen. 2014. Unruly mothers or unruly practices? Disabled mothers surviving oppressive state practices in Australia. In Disabled mothers: Stories and scholarship by and about mothers with disabilities, ed. Filax, G. and Taylor, D. Bradford, Ont.: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Garland‐Thomson, Rosemarie. 1996. Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Kim Q., ed. 2011. Feminist disability studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Denise Sherer. 1999. The question of David: A disabled mother's journey through adoption, family, and life. Berkeley: Creative Arts Book Co.Google Scholar
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Karen, Robert. 1994. Becoming attached: Unfolding the mystery of the infant–mother bond and its impact on later life. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Lewiecki‐Wilson, Cynthia, and Cellio, Jen, eds. 2011a. Disability and mothering: Liminal spaces of embodied knowledge. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Lewiecki‐Wilson, Cynthia, and Cellio, Jen, eds. 2011b. Introduction. In Disability and mothering: Liminal spaces of embodied knowledge, ed. Lewiecki‐Wilson, C. and Cellio, J. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Margaret. 2001. The politics of disability and feminism: Discord or synthesis? Sociology 35 (3): 715–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malacrida, Claudia. 2012. Mothering and disability: Implications for theory and practice. In Routledge handbook of disability studies, ed. Watson, N., Roulstone, A. and Thomas, C. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malone, Amanda. 2014. Ideal motherhood and surveillance: Young mothers with intellectual disabilities share their stories. In Disabled mothers: Stories and scholarship by and about mothers with disabilities, ed. Filax, G. and Taylor, D. Bradford, Ont.: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Minaki, Christina. 2014. Scrutinizing and resisting oppressive assumptions about disabled parents. In Disabled mothers: Stories and scholarship by and about mothers with disabilities, ed. Filax, G. and Taylor, D. Bradford, Ont.: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Novy, Marianne. 2005. Reading adoption: Family and difference in fiction and drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Rayna, and Ginsburg, Faye D. 2001. Enabling disability: Rewriting kinship, reimagining citizenship. Public Culture 13 (3): 533–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rifkin, Mark. 2006. Romancing kinship: A queer reading of Indian education and Zitkala‐Sa's American Indian stories. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 12 (1): 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochman, Bonnie. 2012. Why parents with disabilities are losing custody of their kids. Time, November 27, 2012. http://healthland.time.com/2012/11/27/why-parents-with-disabilities-are-losing-custody-of-their-kids/ (accessed April 23, 2014).Google Scholar
Samuels, Ellen. 2011. Critical divides: Judith Butler's body theory and the question of disability. In Feminist disability studies, ed. Hall, Kim Q. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1991. The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry 17 (4): 773–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2007. Melanie Klein and the difference affect makes. South Atlantic Quarterly 106 (3): 625–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. The social model of disability. In The disability studies reader, ed. Davis, L. J. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sophocles. 2013. Antigone. Trans. D. D. Mulroy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stack, Carol B. 1974. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Stone, Alison. 2012. Against matricide: Rethinking subjectivity and the maternal body. Hypatia 27 (1): 118–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Carol. 1997. The baby and the bath water: Disabled women and motherhood in social context. Sociology of Health & Illness 19 (5): 622–43.Google Scholar
Walsh, Samantha. 2014. “Where do babies come from?”: Meeting Joanne and Kyle: A reaction on mothering, disability and identity. In Disabled mothers: Stories and scholarship by and about mothers with disabilities, ed. Filax, G. and Taylor, D. Bradford, Ont.: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1991. Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 2014. The times we're in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative “turn.” Feminist Theory 15 (1): 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnicott, Donald. 1949. Hate in the countertransference. International Journal of Psycho‐Analysis 30: 69–74.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald. 1953. Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not‐me possession. International Journal of Psycho‐Analysis 34: 89–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Winnicott, Donald. 1965. The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar