Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:04:20.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Reflection: Beyond Impartial Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Diana Tietjens Meyers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers two accounts of the self that have gained prominence in contemporary feminist psychoanalytic theory and draws out the implications of these views with respect to the problem of moral reflection. I argue that our account of moral reflection will be impoverished unless it mobilizes the capacity to empathize with others and the rhetoric of figurative language. To make my case for this claim, I argue that John Rawls's account of reflective equilibrium suffers from his exclusive reliance on impartial reason.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 21 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addelson, Kathryn. 1991. Impure thoughts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 1987. The need for more than justice. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed. Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary: The University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Beardsley, Elizabeth Lane. 1982. On curing conceptual confusion: A response to Mary Anne Warren. In “Femininity,”“masculinity,” and androgyny, ed. Vetterling‐Braggin, Mary. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone. 1989. The second sex, trans. Parshley, H. M.New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. 1979. A theory of the right and the good. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1980. Gender, relation, and difference in psychoanalytic perspective. In The future of difference, ed. Eisenstein, Hester and Jardine, Alice. Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1986. Toward a relational individualism: The mediation of self through psychoanalysis. In Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought, ed. Heller, Thomas C., Sosna, Morton, and Wellbery, David E.Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1989. Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1991. Beyond accommodation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1989. Feminism and modern friendship: Dislocating the community. Ethics 99: 275–90.10.1086/293066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1992. Empathy, mind, and morals. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66: 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1987. Non‐contractual society. In Science, morality, and feminist theory, ed. Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1989. Rights and goods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. N.d. Feminist transformations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 1985. The practice of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy 82:414–36.10.2307/2026397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara. 1991. Agency, attachment, and difference. Ethics 101: 775–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas Jr. 1987. The importance of autonomy. In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1988. Woman as metaphor. Hypatia 3(2): 63–86.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00069.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraditor, Aileen. 1965. The ideas of the woman storage movement, 1890–1920. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art, trans. Gorz, Thomas, Jardine, Alice, and Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986. The Kristeva reader, ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987a. Tales of love, trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987b. In the beginning was love: Psychoanalysis and faith. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1991. Strangers to ourselves, trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. 1987. The socialized individual and individual autonomy: An intersection between philosophy and psychology. In Women and moral theory, ed. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. 1992. The subversion of women's agency in psychoanalytic feminism: Chodorow, Flax, Kristeva. In Revaluing French feminism, ed. Fraser, Nancy and Bartky, Sandra. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. 1993. Social exclusion, moral reflection, and rights. Law and Philosophy 12: 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. N.d. Moral Reflection. New York: Routledge. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making all the difference. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn Pauly. 1991. Women and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women's bodies. Hypatia 6(3): 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1990. Love's knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics 99:229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, Adrian M. S. 1991. Impartiality, compassion and modal imagination. Ethics 101: 726–57.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1985. Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14:223–51.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1992. Justice in families, unpublished APA symposium paper.Google Scholar
Schlafly, Phyllis. 1972. The right to be a woman. Phyllis Schlafly Report 6.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1989. Moral understandings. Hypatia 4(2): 15–28.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00570.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1991. Partial consideration. Ethics 101: 758–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1992. Feminism, ethics, and the question of theory. Hypatia 7(3): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1991. The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar