Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:43:46.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“A Matter of Affect, Passion, and Heart”1: Our Taste for New Narratives of the History of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Penelope Deutscher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article compares translation and commentary practices surrounding the texts associated with French feminism with those of contemporary French women philosophers more generally. Many of the latter, discussing the history of philosophy, ask questions such as “How do texts play against the means they supply themselves?” and “How are philosophical forces, and the institutions of commentary, countered, destabilized, deregulated?” Deutscher asks what institutional means are available to understand this work as innovative philosophy, and to what extent these projects can usefully be analyzed as the gestures of women in philosophy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Contemporary French Women Philosophers , Fall 2000 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

David‐Ménard, Monique 1992. La folie dans la raison pûre: Sur la genèse d'une lecture. Cahiers du grif 46: 41–45.Google Scholar
David‐Ménard, Monique 1997. Les constructions de l'universel: Psychanalyse, philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix 1994. What is philosophy? Trans.Tomlinson, Hugh and Burchell, Graham. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Duroux, Françoise 1999. Statut des études féministes en France. Diplômées 188(March): 3–7.Google Scholar
Farias, Victor 1989. Heidegger and Nazism. ed.Margolis, Joseph and Rockmore, Tom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy 1989. Introduction. Hypatia 3(3): 1–9.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00184.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatens, Moira, and Lloyd, Genevieve 1999. Collective imaginings: Spinoza past and present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira, and Lloyd, Genevieve 2000. The power of Spinoza: Feminist conjunctions. Interview by Susan James. Hypatia 15(2): 40–58.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1985. The self‐assertion of the German university. The Review of Metaphysics 38(3): 470–80.Google Scholar
Imbert, Claude. Forthcoming. An interview with Claude Imbert. By Penelope Deutscher. Women's Philosophy Review.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans.Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985b. This sex which is not one. Trans.Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
James, Susan 1997. Passion and action: The emotions in seventeenth century philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mondzain, Marie‐José. 1993. Image, icône, économie: Les sources byzantines de l'imaginaire contemporain. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Neske, Günther, and Kettering, Emil 1990. Martin Heidegger and national Socialism. Trans.Harries, Lisa. New York: Paragon.Google Scholar
Soulez, Antonia 1998. Essai sur le libre jeu de la volonté. In Leçons sur la liherté de la volonté, by Ludwig Wittgenstein. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar