Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T08:09:53.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marx, Malthus, and the Moral Economy of Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2023

Lillian Cicerchia Open the ORCID record for Lillian Cicerchia [Opens in a new window]
Lillian Cicerchia*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the “backlash thesis” as a way of interpreting hostility and resistance to reproductive rights in the United States. The dominant interpretation of resistance to abortion rights or of advocacy for population control is that they are a backlash against feminism and civil rights. Granting that the backlash thesis has intuitive appeal, the article argues that it is not adequate to a contemporary analysis of these issues. It then claims that what is needed is an account of the contradictory and dynamic way in which capitalism generates anxiety about fertility and family life. The article then uses socialist feminist social reproduction theory to develop an alternative explanatory framework for why market forces form the precondition and basis for context-specific appeals to tradition rather than being antithetical to them. The latter includes both pronatalist ideas and neo-Malthusian ones about population control. The article concludes by suggesting ways in which the analysis can be useful in other contexts.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , Summer 2023 , pp. 587 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Cynthia M. 2020. Abortion is not health care, and amid global coronavirus crisis, it's not “essential.” https://www.startelegram.com/opinion/cynthia-m-allen/article241714886.html. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, April 14.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG). 2020. Joint statement on abortion access during the COVID-19 outbreak. https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2020/03/joint-statement-on-abortion-access-during-the-covid-19-outbreak.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2020. Why abortion and contraception are essential healthcare. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/04/abortion-contraception-essential/.Google Scholar
Andrews, Becca. 2020. How anti-abortion advocates are co-opting and twisting calls for racial justice. Mother Jones, August 14. https:/www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/08/abortion-reasons-ban-race-justice-language/.Google Scholar
Arruzza, Cinzia. 2016. Functionalist, determinist, reductionist: Social reproduction feminism and its critics, Science & Society 80 (1): 9-30.Google Scholar
Arruzza, Cinzia, Bhattacharya, Tithi, and Fraser, Nancy. 2018. Feminism for the 99%: A manifesto. London and New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Beisel, Nicola and Kay, Tamara. 2004. Abortion, race, and gender in nineteenth-century America. American Sociological Review 69 (4): 498–518.Google Scholar
Bonnette, Kathleen. 2020. To be truly pro-life, the church must be antiracist. https://uscatholic.org/articles/202010/to-be-truly-pro-life-the-church-must-be-antiracist/. U.S. Catholic, October 13.Google Scholar
Camosy, Charles C. 2017. Pro-life movement needs to embrace racial justice, activist says. Crux Now, October 30. www.cruxnow.com/interviews/2017/10/pro-life-movement-needs-embrace-racial-justice-activist-says/.Google Scholar
Cho, Timothy I. 2017. A look inside the growing African-American pro-life movement. Faithfully Magazine, December 21. https://faithfullymagazine.com/african-american-pro-life-movement/.Google Scholar
Clarke, Alan. 1987. Moral protest, status defence and the anti-abortion campaign. British Journal of Sociology 38 (2): 235–53.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2004. Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cudd, Ann E. 2015. Is capitalism good for women? Journal of Business Ethics 127 (4): 761–70.Google Scholar
Cudd, Ann E., and Holmstrom, Nancy. 2011. Capitalism, for and against: A feminist debate. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela. 1983. Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela. 1998. The Angela Y. Davis reader. Malden, Mass., and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Dobbins-Harris, Shyrissa. 2017. The myth of abortion as black genocide: Reclaiming our reproductive cycle. National Black Law Journal 26 (1): 85–127.Google Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 1991. Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society must be defended: Lectures at the college de France 1975–1976. Trans. Macey, David. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2016. Contradictions of capitalism and care. New Left Review 100 (July/Aug): 99–117.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Michele. 2020. The racist history of abortion and midwifery bans. American Civil Liberties Union, July 1. https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/the-racist-history-of-abortion-and-midwifery-bans/.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lisa. 2002. The moral property of women: A history of birth control politics in America. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Guglielmo, Letizia, ed. 2018. Misogyny in American culture: Causes, trends, and solutions, volume Santa, I. Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Guttmacher Institute. December 2019. State policy trends: 2019: A wave of abortion bans, but some states are fighting back. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/12/state-policy-trends-2019-wave-abortion-bans-some-states-are-fighting-back.Google Scholar
Johnson, Alexis McGill, and Jones, Marsha. 2020. Your job is deemed essential, but your abortion is not: Black low-wage women in Texas are being robbed of their humanity. Essence, April 20. https://www.essence.com/feature/black-women-texas-abortion-ban/.Google Scholar
Keating, Dan, Tierney, Laurent, and Meko, Tim. 2020. In these states, pandemic crisis response includes attempts to stop abortion. Washington Post, April 23. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/21/these-states-pandemic-crisis-response-includes-attempts-stop-abortion/?arc404=true. Washington Post, April 23.Google Scholar
Kelley, Jonathan, Evans, M. D. R., and Headey, Bruce. 1993. Moral reasoning and political conflict: The abortion controversy. British Journal of Sociology 44 (4): 589–612.Google Scholar
Kelly, Caroline. 2020. Federal judges in 3 states block orders limiting abortion access over coronavirus. CNN Politics, March 31. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/30/politics/texas-order-abortion-block-coronavirus/index.html.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Jenna M. 2014. Health rights are civil rights: Peace and justice activism in Los Angeles, 1963–1978. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Manne, Kate. 2018. Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Carol. 2000. Cracked babies and the partial birth of a nation: Millennialism and fetal citizenship. Cultural Studies 14 (1): 35–60.Google Scholar
Mason, Carol 2002. The apocalyptic narrative of pro-life politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Petschesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1990. Abortion and woman's choice: The state, sexuality, and reproductive freedom. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 1997. Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Ross, Loretta J. 2018. Demographically doomed: White supremacy, electoral power and reproductive justice. DifferenTakes 92 (Spring): 1–8.Google Scholar
Ross, Loretta J., Roberts, Lynn, Derkas, Erika, Peoples, Whitney, and Toure, Pamela Bridgewater. 2017. Radical reproductive justice: Foundations, theory, practice, critique. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Lorretta, and Solinger, Rickie. 2017. Reproductive justice: An introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Solinger, Rickie. 2001. Beggars and choosers: How the politics of choice shapes adoption, abortion, and welfare in the United States. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Solinger, Rickie, and Nakachi, Mie. 2016. Reproductive states: Global perspectives on the invention and implementation of population policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jamila, and Perrit, Jamila Burgess. 2020. Abortion is essential health care, including during a public health crisis. The Century Foundation, April 2. https://tcf.org/content/commentary/abortion-is-essential-health-care-including-during-a-public-health-crisis/?agreed=1.Google Scholar
Vogel, Lise. 2013. Marxism and the oppression of women: Toward a unitary theory. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Weingarten, Karen. 2011. Bad girls and biopolitics: Abortion, popular fiction, and population control. Literature and Medicine 29 (1): 81–103.Google Scholar
Wesolek, James. 2020. Appeals court: for the 4th time, abortion is not essential healthcare. Texas Values, April 20. https://txvalues.org/2020/04/20/appeals-court-for-the-4th-time-abortion-is-not-essential-healthcare/.Google Scholar
Wright, Melissa W. 2006. Disposable women and other myths of global capitalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Mary. 2013. Roe's race: The supreme court, population control, and reproductive justice. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 25 (1): 1–50.Google Scholar