Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:45:56.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marriage, Autonomy, and the Feminine Protest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Debra B. Bergoffen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper may be read as a reclamation project. It argues, with Simone de Beauvoir, that patriarchal marriage is both a perversion of the meaning of the couple and an institution in transition. Parting from those who have given up on marriage, I identify marriage as existing at the intersection of the ethical and the political and argue that whether or not one chooses marriage, feminists ought not abandon marriage as an institution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 14 , Issue 4: Special Issue: The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir , Fall 1999 , pp. 18 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Beauvoir, Simone. 1944. Pyrrhus et Cinéas. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Frechtman, Bernard. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1952. The second sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M.New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1966. Must we bum Sade? In The marquis de Sade, trans. Michelson, Annette. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1969. La Longue marche. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bergoffen, Debra. 1997. The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered phenomenologies erotic generosities. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bergoffen, Debra. Forthcoming. Between the ethical and the political: The difference of ambiguity. In The existential phenomenology of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Embree, Lester.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1979. Introduction to Emile, by Jean Jacques Rousseau. Trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Chang, Jung. 1991. Wild swans: Three daughters of China. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Ferman, Nicole. 1997. Domesticating passions: Rousseau, woman and nation. Hanover: Wesleyan Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1961. Civilization and its discontents. Trans. Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1955. The phenomenology of mind. Trans. Baillie, J. B.London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1967. Philosophy of right. Trans. Knox, T. M.London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lundgren‐Gothlin, Eva. 1995. Gender and ethics in the philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir. 32 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1955. Emile. Trans. Foxely, Barbara. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1979. Emile. Trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1966. Being and nothingness. Trans. Barnes, Hazel. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar