Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:31:11.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Epistemologists Nervous: Relational Memory and Psychological Individualism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Rockney Jacobsen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We cannot rethink the ethical and political dimensions of memory—especially its role in constituting persons and identities—without rethinking the nature of memory itself. I first describe a traditional epistemological view of memory, according to which memory is a faculty for preserving knowledge of the past, and then juxtapose a relational theory of memory developed by Sue Campbell. The relational theory is represented in terms of a distinction between actions and achievements; this distinction enables us to both clarify and defend the shift from an epistemological to a political conception of memory. On the resulting view, accuracy, not truth, is the appropriate norm for evaluating memory, and remembering is no longer conceived as an interior process. In the penultimate section I confront an objection to a relational theory of memory—and to relational theories of cognition generally—and suggest a strategy of response.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , Summer 2019 , pp. 405 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1984. The complete works of Aristotle, vol. 2. Revised Oxford translation, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Armus, H. L., Montgomery, A. R., and Jellison, J. L. 2006. Discrimination learning in paramecia (P. caudatum). Psychological Record 56 (4): 489–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2011. Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1985. Cartesian persons. In Postures of the mind: Essays on mind and morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1997. The commons of the mind: The Paul Carus Lectures. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 1997. Interpreting the personal: Expression and the formation of feelings. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2003. Relational remembering: Rethinking the memory wars. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2004. Models of minds and memory activities. In Moral psychology: Feminist ethics and social theory, ed. DesAutels, Peggy and Urban Walker, Margaret. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield. Reprinted in Campbell 2014b.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2006. Our faithfulness to the past: Reconstructing memory value. Philosophical Psychology 19 (3): 361–80. Reprinted in Campbell 2014b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2008. The second voice. Memory Studies 1 (1): 41–48. Reprinted as The second voice—a manifesto, in Campbell 2014b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Sue 2010. Memory, truth, and the search for an authentic past. In Memory matters: Contexts for understanding sexual abuse recollections, ed. Haaken, Janice and Reavey, Paula. New York: Routledge. Reprinted as Memory, truth, and the search for integrity, in Campbell 2014b.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2014a. Remembering for the future: Memory as a Lens on Canada's Indian Residential School's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Campbell 2014b.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sue. 2014b. Our faithfulness to the past: The ethics and politics of memory, ed. Koggel, Christine M. and Jacobsen, Rockney. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58 (1): 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. An introduction to contemporary epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1922. Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2004. Reconstruction in philosophy. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 2009. Where is my mind? London Review of Books 31 (3): February 12. http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n03/jerry-fodor/where-is-my-mind.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Simona, and Jablonka, Eva. 2009. Epigenetic learning in non‐neural organisms. Journal of Biosciences 34 (4): 633–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbin, Ami. 2014. Mentorship and method: Philosophy and experienced agency. Hypatia 29 (2): 476–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerl, Christoph, and McCormack, Teresa. 2005. Joint reminiscing as joint attention to the past. In Joint attention, communication, and other minds, ed. Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., McCormack, T. and Roessler, J. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2012. The naturalists return. In Preludes to pragmatism: Toward a reconstruction of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koggel, Christine. 2014. Relational remembering and oppression. Hypatia 29 (2): 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 2005. True to life: Why truth matters. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. H. 2015. How places let us feel the past. The New York Times, May 25.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. Introduction. In Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self, ed. Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2010. Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Penner, Terry. 1970. Verbs and the identity of actions—a philosophical exercise in the interpretation of Aristotle. In Ryle: A collection of critical essays, ed. Wood, Oscar P. and Pitcher, George. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1992. The fixation of belief. In The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), ed. Houser, Nathan and Kloesel, Christian. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Quiroga, Rodrigo Quian. 2012. Borges and memory: Encounters with the human brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, Alexis. 2014. “Women don't get AIDS, they just die from it”: Memory, classification, and the campaign to change the definition of AIDS. Hypatia 29 (2): 509–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1998. Moral understandings: A feminist study in ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warnock, Mary. 1987. Memory. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert. 1994. Wide computationalism. Mind 103 (411): 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar