Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:05:54.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Logic of the Development of Feminism; or, Is MacKinnon to Feminism as Parmenides Is to Greek Philosophy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Susan E. Bernick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Catharine MacKinnon's investigation of the role of sexuality in the subordination of women is a logical culmination of radical feminist thought. If this is correct, the position of her work relative to radical feminism is analogous to the place Parmenides's work occupied in ancient Greek philosophy. Critics of MacKinnon's work have missed their target completely and must engage her work in a different way if feminist theory is to progress past its current stalemated malaise.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, Jonathan. 1979. Thales to Zeno. Vol. 1 of The pre‐Socratic philosophers. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1990. Feminism, postmodernism, and gender‐scepticism. In Feminism/postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1989. The essence of the triangle, or, taking the risk of essentialism seriously: Feminist theory in Italy, the U.S. and Britain. Differences 1 (Summer): 3–37.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Introduction. Hyparia 3 (3): 1–10.Google Scholar
Furley, David J. 1967. Parmenides of Elea. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edwards, Paul. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Furth, Montgomery. 1974. Elements of Eleatic ontology. In The pre‐Socratics: A collection of critical essays, ed. Mourelatos, Alexander P.D.Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
Gallop, David. 1984. Parmenides of Elea: Fragments—a text and translation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1967. Pre‐Socratic philosophy. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edwards, Paul. New York: Macmillan, Inc.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. 1975. The Greek philosophers from Thales to Aristotle. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1990. Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women. In Feminism/postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda J.London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hussey, Edward. 1972. The pre‐Socratics. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Jagger, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986. Women's time. In The Kristeva reader, ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1982. Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs 7 (Spring): 515–44.10.1086/493898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1983. Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs 8 (Summer): 635–58.10.1086/494000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1984. Reply to Miller, Acker and Barry, Johnson, West, and Gardiner. Signs 10 (Autumn): 184–188.10.1086/494130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989a. Sexuality, pornography, and method: ‘Pleasure under patriarchy.’ Ethics 99 (January): 314–46.10.1086/293068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989b. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. [1960] 1975. Eleatic questions. In The Eleatics and pluralists. Vol. 2 of Studies in pre‐Socratic philosophy, ed. Allen, R. E. and Furley, D. J.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar