Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:29:01.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Let's Talk about the Weather: Decentering Democratic Debate about Climate Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Bronwyn Hayward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, Bronwyn Hayward, a New Zealander, explores Iris Marion Young's argument for decentered deliberation in the context of climate change debate in the South Pacific. Young's criticisms of a centered approach to local planning are examined. Hayward supports Young's argument for decentered deliberation and her concept of ‘linkage’ as a criterion of good decentered democracy. Local forums are identified as essential sites of struggle against injustice. Decentered democracy is strengthened when multiple linkages connect heal forums across time and space.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 23 , Issue 3: Special Issue: In Honor of Iris Marion Young: Theorist and Practitioner of Justice , September 2008 , pp. 79 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, Neil, 2006. Vulnerability. 32 16: 268–81.Google Scholar
Adger, Neil, and Barnett, Jon. 2005. Compensation for climate change must meet needs. Nature 436 (7049): 328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adger, NeilPaavola, JouniHuq, Saleemul, and Mace, M. J. 2006. Fairness in adaptation to climate change. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, WillBrown, KerryGloag, TonyMorris, JimSimpson, KarenThomas, Jane, and Young, Rob. 1998. Building partnerships for conservation in the Waitaki/Mackenzie basins. Lincoln, New Zealand: Landcare Research. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/sustainablesoc/social/partnerships.asp.Google Scholar
Backstrand, Karin. 2006. Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder democracy and the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations 12 (4): 467–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Jon. 2005. Titanic states? Impacts and responses to climate change in the Pacific Islands. Journal of International Affairs 59 (1): 203–20.Google Scholar
Barnett, Jon, and Adger, Neil. 2003. Climate dangers and atoll countries. Climatic Change 61 (3): 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Jon, and Pauling, Jonathon. 2005. The environmental effects of New Zealand's free‐market reforms. Environment, Development, and Sustainability 7 (2): 271–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Ranu. 2007. Negotiating acts of citizenship in an era of neoliberal reform: The game of school choice international. Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (1): 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1990. Political equality: An essay in democratic theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bengs, Christer. 2005. Planning for the naïve? European Journal of Spatial Development. December. http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret. 1999. Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2004. Decentering democracy: Inclusion and transformation in complex societies. The Good Society 13 (2): 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James. 2007. Democracy across borders: From dêmos to dêmoi. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston, JonathanLevine, StephenMcLeay, Elizabeth, and Roberts, Nigel S. 1996. New Zealand under MMP: A new politics? Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Sharyn. 2007. Listening to a whisper: Gender and vulnerability to climate change. In Going under: Te korokoro o te Parata. Special issue of Just Change: Critical Thinking on Global Issues 10 (October): 16.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Anabela, and Burgess, Jacquelin. 2005. Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspaper, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis 25, no. 6: 1457–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The rule of the many. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Drage, Jean ed. 2002. Empowering communities? Representation and participation in New Zealand's local government. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Andrew, and Parson, Edward. 2006. The science and politics of global climate change: A guide to the debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, Kevin. 1998. Rethinking ethnic concentration: The case of Cabramatta, Sydney. Urban Studies 35 (3): 503–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxfield, Flint. 2007. The twin crises of climate change. In Going under: Te korokoro o te Parata. Special issue of Just Change: Critical Thinking on Global Issues 10 (October): 6–10.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive democracy. In Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2006. Deliberative global politics: Discourse and democracy in a divided world. Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Rosemary, and Alice, Lynne, eds. 1998. Feminist thought in Aotearoa, New Zealand: Connections and differences. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fainstein, Susan. 2007. Iris Marion Young (1946–2006): A tribute. Antipode 39 (2): 382–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise. Policy Sciences 26 (3): 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forester, John. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, John. 1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2003. Recipes for public spheres. 32 3: 338–67.Google Scholar
Gastil, John, and Levine, Peter. 2005. The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty‐first century. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Gleeson, Brendan, and Low, Nicholas. 2000. Australian urban planning: New challenges, new agendas. St. Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, and Dryzek, John. 2006. Deliberative impacts: The macro‐political uptake of mini‐publics. Politics & Society 34 (2); 219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajer, Maarten, and Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2003. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Bronwyn. 1995. The greening of participatory democracy. Environmental Politics 4 (4): 215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Bronwyn. 2003. Deliberative planning and urban sustainability. In Living space: Towards sustainable settlements in New Zealand, ed. Freeman, Claire and Thompson‐Fawcett, Michelle. Dunedin: Otago University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, Bronwyn. 2005. Effective citizen engagement and social learning in environmental policy: The New Zealand experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Hayward, Janine. 2003. Local government and the Treaty of Waitangi. Sydney: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Healey, Patsy. 1992. Planning through debate: The communicative turn. 32 632: 143–62.Google Scholar
Healey, Patsy. 1997. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healthy Communities Coalition. 2005. 50 stories in 50 days. Franklin, Australia: Franklin Community Health Network.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Caroline. 2006. Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. 32 54: 486–508.Google Scholar
Hillier, Jean. 1993. To boldly go where no planners have ever. Environment and Planning D (Society and Space) 11 (1): 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iati, Iati. 2007. Civil society and political accountability in Samoa. Macmillian Brown Centre for Pacific Studies, working paper no. 1. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, http://www.pacs.canterbury.ac.nz/documents/Civil_Society.pdf.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups 1, 2, 3 to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ed. Pachuri, R. K. and Reisinger, And A. Geneva, Switzerland .Google Scholar
Innes, Judith. 1995. Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 4 (3): 183–90.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kahukiwa, Robin. 2006. Matatuhi. Auckland: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kallis, Giorgos. 2006. Participatory methods for water resource planning. 32 24: 215–34.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher, and Mansbridge, Jane. 2005. Disagreement and consensus: The need for dynamic updating in public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 1 (1): 348–64.Google Scholar
Kennaway, Richard. 1999. New Zealand's international environmental policies: A case of leadership lost? The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs (July): 483–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefale, Pene. 2003. Indigenous knowledge in the Pacific. Tempo: Global warming and the third world, no. 49 http://www.tiempocyberclimate.org/portal/archive/issue49/t49al.htm.Google Scholar
Lefale, Pene. 2007. Unpublished conference presentation on IPCC working group 2, chaps. 11, 16. New Zealand Royal Society, April 6, Wellington.Google Scholar
Leichenko, Robin, and O'Brien, Karen. 2008. Double exposure: Global environmental change in an era of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Thomas, and Brown, Katrina, et al. 2006. Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science 14 (5): 435–58.Google Scholar
Maldives Ministry of Environment. 2007. Small states conference on sea level rise 1989 http://www.environment.gov.mv/CC/cc.php (accessed May 5, 2007).Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In Deliberative politics: essays on democracy and disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martyn, Liz. 2007. The tides and getting higher: A Pacific voice on climate change. In Going under: Te korokoro o te Parata. Special issue of Just Change: Critical Thinking on Global Issues 10 (October): 22–23.Google Scholar
New Zealand Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2001. NZ climate change: Maori issues report. Wellington: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.Google Scholar
New Zealand Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2002. Climate change: A consultation snapshot. Wellington: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.Google Scholar
New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. 1990. Manatu Maori. He Putanga ke no te ahua rangi: Tona awe kaha me te urupare a te Maori: Climate change: Impact and response for the Maori community. Wellington: Wellington Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
New Zealand Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2001. NZ climate change: Maori issues report. Wellington: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.Google Scholar
New Zealand Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. 2002. Climate change: A consultation snapshot. Wellington: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Onora. 1996. Towards justice and virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, John. 2007. Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrons, Diane, and Skyers, Sophia. 2003. Empowerment through participation? Conceptual explorations and a case study. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (2): 265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, Stephanie. 2007. Shifting tides: Indigenous responses to global climate change. In Going under: Te korokoro o te Parata. Special issue of Just Change: Critical Thinking on Global Issues 10 (October): 27.Google Scholar
Proctor, Wendy, and Drechsler, Martin. 2006. Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. 32 24: 169–90.Google Scholar
Sager, Tore. 2005. Communicative planners as naïve mandarins of the neo‐liberal sate? European Journal of Spatial Development (December). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/.Google Scholar
Sandercock, Leonie. 2003. Cosmopolis 2: Mongrel cities of the 21st century. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Serawe, Stewart. 2007. Revitalizing customary knowledge to cope with disasters in the face of global warming. In Going under: Te korokoro o te Parata. Special issue of Just Change: Critical Thinking on Global Issues 10 (October): 24–25.Google Scholar
Sharp, Andrew. 1997. Justice and the Maori: The philosophy and practice of Maori claims in New Zealand since the 1970s. 2nd ed. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shibuya, Eric. 1996. Roaring mice against the tide: The South Pacific islands and agenda building on global warming. Pacific Affairs 69 (4): 541–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
South Pacific Forum. 1999. Forum communiqué thirtieth South Pacific forum. Koror, Republic of Palau, October 3–5.Google Scholar
Statistics New Zealand. 2007. Analytical report: Access to the internet. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Ann. 2004. The Treaty of Waitangi and social well being: Justice, representation, and participation. In The Treaty of Waitangi: Mäori and Pakeha perspectives, ed. Belgrave, M., Kawharu, M., and Williams, D.Sydney: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tonn, Bruce. 2007. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: A global scale transformative initiative. Futures 39 (5): 614–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umemoto, Karen. 2001. Walking in another's shoes: epistemological challenges in participatory planning. 32 21: 17–31.Google Scholar
Warwick, Richard. 2006. Climate change impacts and adaptation in the Pacific: Recent breakthroughs in concept and practice. In Confronting climate change: Critical issues for New Zealand, ed. Chapman, Ralph, Boston, Jonathan, and Schwass, Margot. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Weale, Albert. 1999. Democracy. London: St Martins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weale, Albert. 2002. Risk, democratic citizenship, and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edward, Weber. 1998. Pluralism by the rules: Conflict and cooperation in environmental regulation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret, and Yeatman, Anna. 1995. Justice, biculturalism, and difference. Auckland: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Young, David. 2007. Keeper of the long view: Sustainability and the PCE. Wellington: Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1995. Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In Justice and antipodean practices, ed. William, Margaret and Yeatman, Anna. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29 (5): 670–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2004. Response to Bohman, Drexler, and Hames‐Garcia. The Good Society 13 (2): 61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2006a. The importance of de‐centering deliberative democracy. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Philosophical Association, Central Division. April 26–29, Chicago, Ill .Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2006b. De‐centering deliberative democracy. Kettering Review 24, no. 3 (Autumn): 43–60.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2006c. Katrina: Too much blame, not enough responsibility. Dissent Magazine http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/article=158/amp;print=1.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2006d. Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. 32 23: 102–30.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2007. Global challenges: War, self‐determination, and responsibility for justice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar