Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:02:54.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to “Sorcerer Love,” by Luce Irigaray

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

“Sorcerer Love” is the name that Luce Irigaray gives to the demonic function of love as presented in Plato's Symposium. She argues that Socrates there attributes two incompatible positions to Diotima, who in any case is not present at the banquet. The first is that love is a mid-point or intermediary between lovers which also teaches immortality. The second is that love is a means to the end and duty of procreation, and thus is a mere means to immortality through which the lovers lose one another. Irigaray argues in favor of the first position, a conception of love as demonic intermediary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gallop, Jane. 1982. The daughter's seduction: feminism and psychoanalysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-16779-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1973. Le langage des déments. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111323497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1974. Speculum of the other woman. Trans.Gill, Gillian, 1985. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1977. This sex which is not one. Trans.Porter, Catherine with Burke, Carolyn, 1985. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1979. And the one doesn't stir without the other. Trans. Helene Vivienne Wenzel. Signs 7(1981): 6067.10.1086/493859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1980. Amante marine. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1983a. La Croyance Même. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1983b. L'oubli de l'air. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1984. Ethique de la différence sexuelle. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. Parler nest jamais neutre. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1987. Sexes et parentés. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1980. The Enigma of Woman. Trans.Porter, Catherine, 1985. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kuykendall, Eleanor H. 1983. Toward an ethic of nurturance: Luce Irigaray on mothering and power. In Mothering: essays in feminist theory, ed. Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld: 263274.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1988. The hidden host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato's Symposium. Hypatia, this issue.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaza, Monique. 1980. “Phallomorphic” Power and the Psychology of “Woman.” Feminist Issues, I: 71102.10.1007/BF02685560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcot, Joyce, ed. 1983. Mothering: essays in feminist theory. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Wider, Kathleen. 1986. Women philosophers in the ancient greek world: Donning the mantle. Hypatia, 1(1) 2162.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1986.tb00521.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1984. Love, knowledge, and transformation. Women's Studies International Forum 4(5): 393405.10.1016/0277-5395(84)90039-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar