No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Headaches or Headless: Who Is Poet Enough?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
Psychoanalysis has long cited poetry as the expressive vehicle for unconscious production. This article addresses the sexual politics of psychoanalyses conjoining of poetry and the “feminine.” The argument of this text is that the coupling of the “feminine” and the poetic in Lacanian discourse is a metaphorical double cross which most often leaves “woman” at a loss for words.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Helene, Cixous. 1980. The laugh of the Medusa, Trans. Cohen, Keith and Cohen, Paula. In New French feminisms, ed. Marks, Elaine and De Courtivron, Isabelle. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana. 1987. Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. The uses and abuses of Frenchdiscourse theories for feminist politics. Boundary 2:82–101.10.2307/303566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1965. New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis, Trans. Strachey, James. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1990. Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203330029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This sex which is not one, Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits: A selection, Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Jean, Laplanche, and Pontalis, J.‐B. 1973. The language of psycho‐analysis, Trans. Nicholson‐Smith, Donald. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar