Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:57:41.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gender/Science System: Response to Kelly Oliver

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

I welcome the opportunity to respond to Kelly Oliver's critique of my paper published earlier in this journal for at least three reasons: out of respect for the tradition of intellectual exchange to which Oliver's invitation tacitly appeals; because the issues are of quite general importance, even far beyond feminist theory; and out of fidelity to the goals of contemporary feminist theory, central to which I take to be the unravelling of classical dichotomies. This commitment inspires me to protest the current tendency among some feminist critics to tacitly reinforce (often under the name of “deconstruction”) the very dichotomy between objectivism and relativism which I and others have sought to undermine. Here, as always, the tell-tale marks of such oppositional reconstructions are to be found in the collapse and obliteration of distinctions internal to the categories under questions.

Type
Comment/Reply
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1987. The gender/science system: Or, is sex to gender as nature is to science? Hypatia 2(3): 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. Keller's gender/science system. Hypatia, this issue.Google Scholar