Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:07:01.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Other Categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Linda Fisher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In my discussion of Bordo's paper I leave aside the particulars of her detailed critique of Grimshaw and the issue of the “maleness” of philosophy and focus instead on some questions raised by her analysis of heterogeneity and generality. I find this analysis very persuasive, particularly her counterarguments to the “theoretics of heterogeneity.” However, 1 am less persuaded by her concluding points and suggestions for future directions.

Type
Symposium on Susan Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1992 , pp. 173 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordo, Susan. 1988. Feminist skepticism and the “maleness” of philosophy. Abbreviated version. TheJournal of Philosophy 85(11): 619–29.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1990. Feminism, postmodernism, and gender‐skepticism. In Feminism/postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1990. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In Feminism/postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Philosophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar