Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:17:15.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Reactions to the Contemporary Security Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Iris Marion Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The essay theorizes the logic of masculinist protection as an apparently benign form of male domination. It then argues that authoritarian government is often justified through a logic of masculinist protection, and that this is the form of justification for the security regime that has emerged in the United States since September 11, 2001. 1 argue that those who live under a security regime live within an oppressive protection racket. The paper ends by cautioning feminists not ourselves to adopt a stance of protector toward women in so-called less developed societies.

Type
Forum on September 11, 2001: Feminist Perspectives on Terrorism
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Philosophy and the Problem of Evil , Winter 2003 , pp. 223 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlant, Lauren. 1997. The theory of infantile citizenship. In The queen of America goes to Washington city: Essays on sex and citizenship. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2001. War and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. [1668] 1994. Leviathan. Ed. Curley, Edwin. Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Compnay.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lerner, Sharon. 2001. Feminists agonize over war in Afghanistan: What women want. Village Voice, 31 October, n.p.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra, and Russo, Ann eds., 1991. Third world women and the politics of femnism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions and third world feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Susan Rae. 1977. Coercion and rape: The state as a male protection racket. In Feminism and Philosophy, ed. Vetterling Braggin, Mary. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Sevenjhuisen, Selma. 1998. Justice, care and citizenship. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1994. Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Autonomy, welfare reform, and meaningful work. In Philosophical approaches to dependency, ed. Kittay, Eva Feder and Feder, Ellen, Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar