Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:03:48.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Epistemology at Hypatia's 25th Anniversary1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Helen Longino
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay surveys twenty-five years of feminist epistemology in the pages of Hypatia. Feminist contributions have addressed the affective dimensions of knowledge; the natures of justification, rationality, and the cognitive agent; and the nature of truth. They reflect thinking from both analytic and continental philosophical traditions and offer a rich tapestry of ideas from which to continue challenging tradition and forging analytical tools for the problems ahead.

Type
Invited Papers
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures: The 25th Anniversary Issue , Summer 2010 , pp. 733 - 741
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth, eds. 1996. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2004. Uses of value judgments in feminist social science: A case study of research on divorce. Hypatia 19 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antony, Louise, and Witt, Charlotte, eds. 19932002. A mind of one's own. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braaten, Jane. 1990. Towards a reassessment of intellectual virtue. Hypatia 5 (3): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1993. Embodiment, sexual difference, and the nomadic subject. Hypatia 8 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, Sharyn. 2004. Having it all: Naturalized normativity in feminist science studies. Hypatia 19 (1): 102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1994. Responsibility and rhetoric. Hypatia 9 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1998. How to think globally: Stretching the limits of imagination. Hypatia 13 (2): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalmiya, Vrinda. 2002. Why should a knower care? Hypatia 17 (1): 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasswick, Heidi. 2004. Individuals‐in‐communities: The search for a feminist model of epistemic subjects. Hypatia 19 (3): 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2009. Panel presentation. Founders on rationality, science, and epistemic humility. Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures: Hypatia 25th Anniversary Conference. University of Washington. October 22–24, http://www.wiley.com/go/Hypatia‐podcasts (accessed June 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 2009. Founders on rationality, science, and epistemic humility. Feminist Legacies/Feminist Futures: Hypatia 25th Anniversary Conference. University of Washington. October 22–24, http://www.wiley.com/go/Hypatia‐podcasts (accessed June 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Holler, Linda. 1990. Thinking with the weight of the earth: Feminist contributions to an epistemology of concreteness. Hypatia 5 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1987. Le sujet de science: Est‐il sexué?/Is the subject of science sexed? Hypatia 2 (3): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison, and Bordo, Susan, eds. 1989. Gender/body/knowledge. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 1987. Playfulness, “world”‐travelling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2 (2): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, Maria, and Spelman, Elizabeth. 1983. Have we got a theory for you! Women's Studies International Forum 6 (6): 573–81. Reprinted in Hypatia Reborn: Essays in Feminist Philosophy, ed. Azizah al‐Hibri and Margaret Simons. 1990. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn. 1993. A question of evidence. Hypatia 8 (2): 172–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Lynn. 1995. The very idea of feminist epistemology. Hypatia 10 (3): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksala, Johanna. 2004. Anarchic bodies: Foucault and the feminist question of experience. Hypatia 19 (4): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 1991. Gendered reason: Sex metaphor and conceptions of reason. Hypatia 6 (2): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 2003. Feminist pragmatist revisionings of reason, knowledge, and philosophy. Hypatia 18 (2): 15–37.Google Scholar
Ruetsche, Laura. 2004. Virtue and contingent history: Possibilities for feminist epistemology. Hypatia 19 (1): 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Though this be method, yet there is madness in it: Liberal epistemology and paranoia. In A mind of one's own, ed. Antony, Louise and Witt, Charlottoe. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 2001. Epistemology resuscitated: Objectivity as trustworthiness. In Engendering rationalities, ed. Tuana, Nancy and Morgan, Sandra. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1991. The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry 17 (4): 773–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone‐Mediatore, Sharon. 1998. Chandra Mohanty and the re‐valuing of experience. Hypatia 13 (2): 116–33.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, and Morgan, Sandra, eds. 2001. Engendering rationalities. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, and Sullivan, Shannon, eds. 2007. Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar