Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:03:43.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

February 22, 2001: Toward a Politics of the Vulnerable Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Debra Bergoffen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On February 22, 2001, three Bosnian Serb soldiers were found guilty of crimes against humanity. Their offense? Rape. This is the first time that rape has been pros-ecuted and condemned as a crime against humanity. Appealing to Jacques Derrida's democracy of the perhaps and Judith Butler's politics of performative contradiction, I see this judgment inaugurating a politics of the vulnerable body which challenges current understandings of evil, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Philosophy and the Problem of Evil , Winter 2003 , pp. 116 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Améry, Jean. 1986. At the mind's limits. In Contemplations by a survivor on Auschwitz and its realities, trans. Rosenfeld, Sidney and Rosenfeld, Stella P.New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2001. The end of sexual difference? In Feminist consequences: Theory for the new century, ed. Bronfen, Elisabeth and Kavka, Misha. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Crossette, Barbara. 2001. A new legal weapon to deter rape. The New York Times, 10 March.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1997. Politics of friendship, trans. Collins, George. New York: Verso Press.Google Scholar
Editorial. 2001. A landmark ruling on rape. The New York Times, 24 February.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hankey, Leone Sandra. 1997. Women write patriarchal wrongs: Narrative resistance to the rape culture. In Beyond Portia: Women, law and literature in the United States, ed. St. Joan, Jacqueline and McElheney, Annette Bennington. Boston: Northeastern Press.Google Scholar
Herrera‐Sobek, María. 1977. The politics of rape: Sexual transgressions in Chicana fiction. In Beyond Portia: Women law and literature in the United States, ed. St. Joan, Jacqueline and McElheney, Annette Bennington. Boston: Northeastern Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1996. Rethinking obligation for feminism. In Revisioning the political, ed. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Stefano, Christine Di. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. Why define sexed rights? In Je, tu, nous: Toward a culture of difference, trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Molly. 1989. Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1989. Women and consent. In The disorder of women. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, Marlise. 2001a. Bosnian war trial focuses on sex crimes. The New York Times, 16 February.Google Scholar
Simons, Marlise. 2001b. Three Serbs convicted in wartime rapes. The New York Times, 22 February. Trial Chamber. Judgment of trial chamber II in the Kunarac, Kovac and Vukovic case. Retrieved 22 February 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.un.org.icty.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1991. The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a mad law professor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1997. A vindication of the rights of woman. In The vindications, ed. Macdonald, D. L. and Scherf, Kathleen. Orchard Park: Broadview Press.Google Scholar