Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:17:12.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expecting Bad Luck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Lisa Tessman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper draws on Card's discussions of moral luck to consider the complicated moral life of people—described as pessimists—who accept the heavy knowledge of the predictability of the bad moral luck of oppression. The potential threat to ethics posed by this knowledge can be overcome by the pessimist whose resistance to oppression, even in the absence of hope, expresses a sense of still having a “claim” on flourishing despite its unattainability under oppression.

Type
Oppression and Moral Agency: Essays in Honor of Claudia Card
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Oppression and Moral Agency: Essays in Honor of Claudia Card , Winter 2009 , pp. 9 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Lisa Tessman

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1984. Nicomachean ethics. In The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. 1729–867, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 2001. Being good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick. 1992. Faces at the bottom of the well: The permanence of racism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. The unnatural lottery: Character and moral luck. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Martin Luther Jr. 1968/1986. A testament of hope. In A testament of hope: The essential writings and speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr., ed. Washington, James M. 313–28, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1998. Two sorts of naturalism. In Mind, value, and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Originally published in Virtues and reasons: Philippa Foot and moral theory, ed. Hursthouse, Rosalind, Lawrence, Gavin and Quinn, Warren. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1996].Google Scholar
Mills, Charles. 2004. ‘Ideal theory’ as ideology. In Moral psychology, ed. DesAutels, Peggy and Walker, Margaret Urban. 163–81, Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places: Morality, culture, and philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The fragility of goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swanton, Christine. 2003. Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessman, Lisa. 2005. Burdened virtues: Virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1998. Moral understandings: a feminist study in ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 2003. Moral contexts. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 2006. Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Cornel. 1993. Nihilism in black America. In Race matters. 15–31, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
West, Cornel. 1999. Black strivings in a twilight civilization. In The Cornel West reader. 87–118, New York: Basic Civitas Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. Ethical consistency. In Problems of the self. 166–86, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard and Nagel, Thomas. 1976. Moral luck. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 50:115–51.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Five faces of oppression. In Justice and the politics of difference. 39–65, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar