Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:41:04.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence Supporting Pre‐University Effects Hypotheses of Women's Underrepresentation in Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Chris Dobbs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this short essay, I report results from a representative national dataset (n > 7,300) from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program that shows that significantly more men than women intend to major in philosophy at the high‐school and pre‐university level. This lends credence to pre‐university effects hypotheses of women's underrepresentation in philosophy and successfully replicates a smaller analysis performed by Cheshire Calhoun at Colby College in 2009. I also defend my analysis against an objection that claims that intention to major is not a good predictor of final major selection. Finally, I argue that this new analysis should lead to further investment in university‐level diversity programs.

Type
Found Cluster: Issues in the Profession
Information
Hypatia , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 940 - 945
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, Louise. 2012. Different voices or perfect storm: Why are there so few women in philosophy? Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (3): 227–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. The undergraduate pipeline problem. Hypatia 24 (2): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Tom, Baron, Samuel, and Miller, Kristie. 2015. Why do female students leave philosophy? The story from Sydney. Hypatia 30 (2): 467–74.Google Scholar
Higher Education Research Institute. 2016. Data access for researchers. http://heri.ucla.edu/data-access-for-researchers/ (accessed November 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Snyder, Thomas D., and Dillow, Sally A. 2010. Table 275. In Digest of education statistics 2009. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education (NCES).Google Scholar
Snyder, Thomas D., and Dillow, Sally A. 2011. Table 286. In Digest of education statistics 2010. Washington, D.C.: NCES.Google Scholar
Snyder, Thomas D., and Dillow, Sally A. 2015. Table 318.30. In Digest of education statistics 2013. Washington, D.C.: NCES.Google Scholar
Snyder, Thomas D., Dillow, Sandy A., and Hoffman, Charlene M. 2007. Table 258. In Digest of education statistics 2006. Washington, D.C.: NCES.Google Scholar
Snyder, Thomas D., Dillow, Sandy A., and Hoffman, Charlene M. 2008. Table 265. In Digest of education statistics 2007. Washington, D.C.: NCES.Google Scholar
Snyder, Thomas D., Dillow, Sandy A., and Hoffman, Charlene M. 2009. Table 275. In Digest of education statistics 2008. Washington, D.C.: NCES.Google Scholar
Sterns, Elizabeth, Bottía, Martha Cecilia, Davalos, Eleonora, Mickelson, Roslyn Arlin, Moller, Stephanie, and Valentino, Lauren. 2016. Demographic characteristics of high school math and science teachers and girls' success in STEM. Social Problems 63 (1): 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar