Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T12:30:44.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equality and Justice: Remarks on a Necessary Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Birgit Christensen  and
Andrew F. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The processes associated with globalization have reinforced and even increased prevailing conditions of inequality among human beings with respect to their political, economic, cultural, and social opportunities. Yet—or perhaps precisely because of this trend—there has been, within political philosophy, an observable tendency to question whether equality in fact should be treated a as central value within a theory of justice. In response, I examine a number of nonegalitarian positions to try to show that the concept of equality cannot be dispensed with in any adequate consideration of justice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Contemporary Feminist Philosophy in German , Spring 2005 , pp. 155 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109: 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics 98: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Angelika, ed. 2000. Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit: Texte der neuen Egalitarismuskritik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Margalit, Avishai. 1996. The decent society. Trans. Goldblum, Naomi. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marti, Urs. 2000. Freiheit oder Kapitalismus: Warum nur eine altmodische Linke auch eine moderne Linke sein kann, Die Wochenzeitung 38 (September 21): 7.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Moral questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauer‐Studer, Herlinde. 2000. Autonom leben: Reflexionen über Freiheit und Gleichheit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1999. Which equalities matter? Maiden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. New York: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean‐Jacques. 1987. On the social contract. The basic political writings. Trans. Cress, Donald A.Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1990. The faces of injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar