Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T19:07:19.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epistemological Evaluation of Oppositional Secrets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Catherine Hundleby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although political values guide people who take advice from standpoint epistemolo-gies in deciding whether to reveal secrets used to resist oppression, these decisions can also be understood and evaluated in purely cognitive or epistemological terms. When political considerations direct us to preserve a secret, the cognitive value progressively diminishes because the view of the world projected by the secret is increasingly vulnerable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Analytic Feminism , Fall 2005 , pp. 44 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bok, Sissela. 1983. Secrets: On the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1995. Lesbian choices. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. In Beyond methodology. Feminist schohirship as lived research, ed. Fonow, Mary Margaret and Cook, Judith A.Bioomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2001. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. 1995. Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1993. Strong objectivity. In Feminist epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Potter, Elizabeth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Towards a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, andphilosophy of science, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Larsen, Nella. 1997. The complete fiction of Neua harsen: Passing, quicksand, and the stories. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1997. Cognitive and noncognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, ed. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson and Nelson, Jack. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppres' sions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Maree, Claire. 2004. Same‐sex partnerships in Japan: Bypasses and other alternatives. Women's Studies 33: 541–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1997. The racial contract. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1998. Alternative epistemologies. In Blackness visible: Essays on philosophy and race. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, and Nelson, Jack. 1994. Feminist values and cognitive virtues. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 74 (2): 120–29.Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1983. Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9 (1): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. 1974. Women's perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry 44: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. 2001. Living across and through skins: Transactional bodies, pragmatism, and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2004. Why standpoint matters. In The feminist standpoint theory reader, ed. Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 1992. Reasoning about ourselves. In Women and reason, ed. Harvey, Elizabeth and Okruhlik, Kathleen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar